Page 113 - Read Online
P. 113

Agrawal et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2018;5:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2018.17                                          Page 5 of 5

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Concept, design, definition of intellectual content, clinical studies, data acquisition, manuscript preparation,
               manuscript editing, and manuscript review: Agrawal K
               Literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation: Shrotriya R

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               There are no conflicts of interest.

               Patient consent
               Consent has been taken.

               Ethics approval
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.



               REFERENCES
               1.   Honrado CP, Pearlman SJ. Surgical treatment of the nasolabial angle in balanced rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:338-44.
               2.   Sherris DA, Kern EB. Computer-assisted facial analysis. In: Cummings C, Krause CJ, editors. Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery.
                   Vol 2. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 1998. p. 833-43.
               3.   Webster RC, Davidson TM, Smith RC. Importance of the columellar-labial junction in rhinoplasty. Head Neck Surg 1979;1:423-34.
               4.   Ozmen S, Eryilmaz T, Sencan A, Cukurluoglu O, Uygur S, Ayhan S, Atabay K. Sliding alar cartilage (SAC) flap: a new technique for
                   nasal tip surgery. Ann Plast Surg 2009;63:480-5.
               5.   Bohluli B, Varedi P, Nazari S, Bagheri SC. Lateral crural suspension flap: a novel technique to modify and stabilize the nasolabial angle.
                   J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1572-6.
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118