Page 122 - Read Online

Khan Volume difference management in asymmetrical breasts

1986;78:331-5. 11. Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Preoperative sizing in breast augmentation.
3. Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S. Incidence of breast and chest wall Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:1781-7.
asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 12. Khan UD. The impact or preoperative breast implant size selection on
patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1039-50. the 3-year reoipeation rate. Eur J Plast Surg 2013;36:503-10.
4. Khan UD. Breast and chest asymmteries: classification and 13. Tebbets JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation
relative distribution of common asymmteries in patients requesting using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support
augmentation mammoplasty. Eur J Plast Surg 2011;34:375-85. system. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:2005-16.
5. Gabriel A, Fritzche S, Creasman C, Baqai W, Mordaunt D, Maxwell 14. Khan UD. Review of implant sizes in 146 consective asymmetrical
P. Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmteries: 4D photography. augmentation mammoplasties. Eur J Plast Surg 2014;37:273-80.
Aesthet Surg J 2011;31:506-10. 15. Maxwell GP. Breast asymmetry. Aesthet Surg J 2001;21:552-61.
6. Khan UD. Breast augmentation in asymmetrically placed nipple 16. Gallegos ML, Casas LA. A systematic, one-stage approach in the
areolar complex in horizontal axis: lateralization of implant pocket to treatment of tuberous breast deformity. Aesthet Surg J 1998;18:431-8.
offset laterlised nipple. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:591-6. 17. Arco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Gentile P, Castrif, Delago D, Fillingeri
7. Khan UD. Muscle splitting, subglandular and partial submuscular V. Breast asymmetries: a brief review and our experience. Aesthetic
augmentation mammoplastoies: 12-year retrospective analysis of Plast Surg 2006;30:309-19.
2026 primary cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:290-302. 18. Becker H. Adjustable breast implants provide postoperative versatility.
8. Khan UD. Augmentation mastopexy and augmentation mammoplasty: Aesthet Surg J 2000;20:332-4.
an analysis of 1,406 consecutive cases. Plast Aesthet Res 2016;3:26-30. 19. Gore SM, Lamberty GH. Perthese implant-identical cohesive-gel
9. Steven WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM, sizers in breast augmentation: a prospective report on 200 consecutive
Cohen R. Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and cases and implications for treatment of breast asymmetry. Aesthet
effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:674- Surg J 2012;32:310-8.
81. 20. Yasilda AK, Sevin KZ, Sirvan SS, Karsidag S, Tatlidede HS. Our
10. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N. One-stage augmentation combined aurgical approach to treatment of congenital, developmental and
with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic acquired breast asymmetries: a review of 30 cases. Aesth Plast Surg
Plast Surg 2004;28:259-67. 2013;37:77-87.

Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ July 19, 2017 115