Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37
vectors positioned at various angles to the skin tension 3. Davis J, Kitlowski E. The immediate contraction of cutaneous grafts and its
lines. Theoretically, the projection of the skin tension cause. Arch Surg 1931;23:954‑65.
lines to the radii of the circle‑shaped specimens could 4. Hinshaw JR, Miller ER. Histology of healing split‑thickness, full‑thickness
autogenous skin grafts and donor sites. Arch Surg 1965;91:658‑70.
possibly add to their total graft shrinkage. Due to the 5. Corps BV. The effect of graft thickness, donor site and graft bed on graft
small number of specimens, however, further studies shrinkage in the hooded rat. Br J Plast Surg 1969;22:125‑33.
should be conducted in order to determine potential 6. Jones T, McDonald S, Deitch EA. Effect of graft bed on long‑term functional
statistically significant findings. 7. results of extremity skin grafts. J Burn Care Rehabil 1988;9:72‑4.
Davies DM. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Scars, hypertrophic scars,
Mean percentage of primary contraction for square STSGs and keloids. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985;290:1056‑8.
was found to be 3.8 times higher than round STSGs 8. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG, NC3Rs
Reporting Guidelines Working Group. Animal research: reporting in vivo
(4.2% and 11% for square and circular STSGs, respectively). experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 2010;160:1577‑9.
The recorded difference for the FTSGs, however, is not 9. Tomasek JJ, Haaksma CJ. Fibronectin filaments and actin microfilaments
that prodigious. Since this is only a preliminary report are organized into a fibronexus in Dupuytren’s diseased tissue. Anat Rec
1991;230:175‑82.
with a small number of specimens involved, we believe 10. Welch MP, Odland GF, Clark RA. Temporal relationships of F‑actin bundle
that future studies will help to clarify the issue. formation, collagen and fibronectin matrix assembly, and fibronectin receptor
expression to wound contraction. J Cell Biol 1990;110:133‑45.
Limitations regarding human specimens necessitate the 11. Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Barry P, Andrews P, Jester JV. Quantitative
use of animal models; further studies are required in analysis of stress fiber orientation during corneal wound contraction. J Cell
order to investigate whether pigskin is suitable for the Sci 1993;104:353‑63.
study of primary graft contraction. The study cohort is 12. Denefle JP, Lechaire JP, Zhu QL. Cultured epidermis influences the fibril
organization of purified type I collagen gels. Tissue Cell 1987;19:469‑78.
limited and a larger series for all arms is needed for a 13. Souren JM, Ponec M, van Wijk R. Contraction of collagen by human fibroblasts
better understanding of these phenomena. and keratinocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1989;25:1039‑45.
Skin grafts are widely used and any information 14. Brock J, Midwinter K, Lewis J, Martin P. Healing of incisional wounds in the
embryonic chick wing bud: characterization of the actin purse‑string and
regarding their characteristics is valuable. Our demonstration of a requirement for Rho activation. J Cell Biol 1996;135:1097‑107.
preliminary report reveals an expected increased 15. Wang YB, Ogawa Y, Kakudo N, Kusumoto K. Survival and wound contraction
shrinkage of FTSGs compared to STSGs and in a limited of full‑thickness skin grafts are associated with the degree of tissue edema
number of specimens, the shape of the skin graft seems of the graft bed in immediate excision and early wound excision and grafting
in a rabbit model. J Burn Care Res 2007;28:182‑6.
to affect primary contraction of the STSGs. Although 16. Ragnell A. The secondary contracting tendency of free skin grafts; an
it is difficult to dramatically change the shape of skin experimental investigation on animals. Br J Plast Surg 1952;5:6‑24.
grafts, if this feature is ultimately found to alter primary 17. Monteiro‑Riviere NA, Riviere JE. The pig as a model for human skin research.
contraction, the results could possibly be applied in In: Swindle M, Bouchard GF, editors. Swine in Biomedical Research: Update
on Animal Models. Auxvasse: Sinclair Research Center; 2005. p. 17‑22.
clinical practice. 18. Monteiro‑Riviere N. Comparative anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of
mammalian skin. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1991. p. 3‑71.
REFERENCES
How to cite this article: Berezovsky AB, Pagkalos VA, Silberstein E,
1. Harrison CA, MacNeil S. The mechanism of skin graft contraction: an update Shoham Y, Rosenberg L, Krieger Y. Primary contraction of skin grafts:
on current research and potential future therapies. Burns 2008;34:153‑63. a porcine preliminary study. Plast Aesthet Res 2015;2:22-6.
2. Walden JL, Garcia H, Hawkins H, Crouchet JR, Traber L, Gore DC. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Both dermal matrix and epidermis contribute to an inhibition of wound Received: 24-04-2014; Accepted: 28-10-2014
contraction. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:162‑6.
26 Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 1 || Jan 15, 2015