Page 327 - Read Online
P. 327

technique include  those with a deviated  dorsal septum,
          asymmetric dorsal aesthetic lines, and upper lateral
          cartilages of insufficient length at caudal end of the
          septum.  This  population  likely  benefit  from  traditional
          spreader grafts harvested from the nasal septum,
          perhaps combined with autospreader flaps. The thickness
          of free septal grafts can be varied to control asymmetry.
          In the appropriate patient with nasal axial deviation
          who also requires a septoplasty, the combined use of
          autospreader flaps and unilateral or bilateral spreader
          grafts may be indicated to correct asymmetric dorsal
          aesthetic lines. Indications for the use of both techniques
          include widening of the dorsal middle third of the nose
          (especially  in  ethnic  cases),  bridging  and  strengthening
          a long, narrow roof of the middle nose in patients with   Figure 3: Combination use of the spreading grafting
          short nasal bones and high LLCs, straightening and
          stabilizing a dorsally deviated septum, and creating
          ethnically acceptable dorsal aesthetic lines  [Figure  3].
          Nasal septal grafts are thicker and stronger, resisting
          the deforming forces of a deviated septum and thus
          correcting the curvature.  Autospreader flaps alone
                                 [18]
          may not provide adequate stability when there is
          associated collapse of the bony sidewalls. In these
          instances, traditional spreader grafts that extend
          beyond the keystone are indicated. For cases in which
          an autospreader flaps cannot provide sufficient width at
          the anterior septal angle, this area must be supported by
          spreader grafts [Figure 4].

          CONCLUSION
                                                              Figure 4: Indication for spreader graft procedure
          The  patient  with  a  long  nose,  prominent  dorsal hump,
          short  nasal bones  and low LLCs  are  good candidates for
          an  autospreader technique  [Figure  5]. The  technique  is
          simple, reproducible and effective in shaping the dorsum
          while preserving the function of the internal valve in
          primary rhinoplasty patients.  Subperichondrial dissection
          of the nasal framework with preservation of the dynamic
          musculoaponeurotic system  and controlled manipulation
          and repair of ligaments without disturbing the overlying
          soft tissue allows reshaping and redraping of the nasal
          aesthetic lines.
          The relation between  anatomical form and function is
          of enduring interest  in  modern aesthetic  plastic surgery,
          being  central  to  our understanding  of  physiological
          systems. It provides lessons for engineering design based
          on  advanced anatomical  knowledge.  For  now,  limited
          evidence available in PubMed that shows benefit of using   Figure 5: Indication for the autospreader grafting
          spreader flap technique  for correction  of dorsal septal
                   [24]
          deviations.  The use of a spreader flap  technique has   Conflicts of interest
          not been described for special cases with minimal dorsal   There are no conflicts of interest.
          humps and secondary cases. The spreader architecture
          rhinoplasty requires wider studies in compare and contrast   REFERENCES
          flap  and graft techniques to identify which technology
          provides the most benefit in terms of outcomes for more   1.   Nahai  F.  Your  favorite  technique:  time  for  a  change?  Aesthetic Surg J
          durable, consistent, predictable and harmonic results.  2.   2012;32:900‑2.
                                                                  Nahai  F.  Evidence‑based  medicine  in  aesthetic  surgery. Aesthetic  Surg  J
                                                                  2011;31:135‑6.
          Financial support and sponsorship                   3.   Gunter  JP, Hackney  FL. Clinical assessment and facial analysis.
          Nil.                                                    In: Gunter  JP, Rohrich  RJ, Adams WP Jr, editors. Dallas Rhinoplasty:

           318                                                           Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 6 || Nov 12, 2015
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332