Page 269 - Read Online
P. 269

have  a faster  rate  of healing  for both  chronic and acute   wound‑healing: a new perspective for wound‑therapy? Arch Dermatol Res
          wounds.  In the  present  study, a significant  decrease  in   2007;298:413‑20.
                 [8]
          the wound surface pH of chronic wounds (P = 0.048)   7.   Percival  SL,  McCarty  S,  Hunt  JA,  Woods  EJ.  The  effects  of  pH  on
                                                                  wound healing, biofilms and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen
          was noted in patients treated with the LAD as compared   2014;22:174‑86.
          with the conventional group. The lower pH may be one   8.   Kumar P. Exploiting potency of negative pressure in wound dressing using
          of the factors  responsible for improved wound  healing   limited access dressing and suction‑assisted dressing. Indian J Plast Surg
          with LAD as experienced clinically. [18‑21]  Lower systemic   9.   2012;45:302‑15.
                                                                  Shukla VK, Shukla D, Tiwary SK, Aqrawal S, Rastoqi A. Evaluation of pH
          toxic symptoms in patients treated by LAD may be due to   measurement as a method of wound assessment. J Wound Care 2007;16:291‑4.
          reduced activity of bacteria and bacterial toxins under the   10.  Gethin G. The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK
          influence of a lower pH.                                2007;3:52‑6.
                                                              11.  Wilson IA, Henry M, Quill RD, Byrne PJ. The pH of varicose ulcer surfaces
          In conclusion, the study showed a reduction in the wound   and its relationship to healing. Vasa 1979;8:339‑42.
          pH in  LAD treated patients  as compared to those  who   12.  Tsukada K, Tokunaga K, Iwama T, Mishima Y. The pH changes of pressure
          received a conventional dressing treatment. Lowering the   ulcers related to the healing process of wounds. Wounds 1992;4:16‑20.
          pH in  chronic wounds may  accelerate wound healing  by   13.  Romanelli M, Schipani E, Piaggesi A, Barachini P. Evaluation of surface pH
                                                                  on venous leg ulcers under allevyn dressings. In: International Congress
          reestablishing equilibrium in the wound bed.            and Symposium Series‑Royal Society of Medicine, editors. Evidence‑based
                                                                  Woundcare. Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by Smith and Nephew;
          Financial support and sponsorship                       1997 November, 17, UK. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 1998.
          Nil.                                                    p. 57‑60.
                                                              14.  Roberts G, Hammad L, Creevy J, Shearman C, Mani R. Physical changes in
          Conflicts of interest                                   dermal tissues around chronic venous ulcers. In: Proceedings of the European
          There are no conflicts of interest.                     Conference on Advances in Wound Management; 1997 November, 18‑20.
                                                                  Harrogate, UK. London: EMAP Healthcare Ltd.; 1998. p. 104‑5.
                                                              15.  Greener B, Hughes AA, Bannister NP, Douglass J. Proteases and pH in
          REFERENCES                                              chronic wounds. J Wound Care 2005;14:59‑61.
                                                              16.  Gethin GT, Cowman S, Conroy RM. The impact of Manuka honey dressings
          1.   Callam MJ, Ruckley CV, Harper DR, Dale JJ. Chronic ulceration of the   on the surface pH of chronic wounds. Int Wound J 2008;5:185‑94.
             leg: extent of the problem and provision of care. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)   17.  Molan  PC. Re‑introducing honey in the management of wounds and
             1985;290:1855‑6.                                     ulcers‑theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Manage 2002;48:28‑40.
          2.   Nelzen  O, Bergqvist  D, Lindhagen  A. The prevalence of lower‑limb   18.  Kumar PP, Sharma A. The limited access dressing for damage control in
             ulceration has been underestimated: results of a validated population   trauma patients. Wounds 2010;22:188‑92.
             questionnaire. Br J Surg 1996;83:255‑8.          19.  Sreenivas T, Nandish Kumar KC, Menon J, Nataraj AR. Calcific myonecrosis
          3.   O’Brien JF, Grace PA, Perry IJ, Burke PE. Prevalence and aetiology of leg   of the leg treated by debridement and limited access dressing. Int Low Extrem
             ulcers in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 2000;169:110‑2.      Wounds 2013;12:44‑9.
          4.   Ye RC. The relationship of pH of the granulation tissue and the take of the   20.  Friji  MT,  Mohapatra  DP,  Chittoria  RK,  Dinesh  Kumar  S,  Ashokan  A,
             skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1957;19:213‑7.       Vijayaraghavan  N.  Use  of  urine  collection  bag  as  an  alternative  of
          5.   Leveen HH, Falk G, Borek B, Diaz C, Lynfield Y, Wynkoop BJ, Mabunda GA,   custom‑made plastic bag for limited access dressing (LAD). J Soc Wound
             Rubricius JL, Christoudias GC. Chemical acidification of wounds: an adjuvant   Care Res 2013;6:36‑9.
             to healing and the unfavorable action of alkalinity and ammonia. Ann Surg   21.  Chittoria RK, Kumar P, Bajaj SP, Singh AK, Gupta DK. General clinical
             1973;178:745‑53.                                     guidelines for wound management: redefining acronym SWCR. J Soc Wound
          6.   Schneider  LA,  Korber  A,  Grabbe  S,  Dissemond  J.  Influence  of  pH  on   Care Res 2014;7:2‑7.





































           260                                                           Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 5 || Sep 15, 2015
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274