Page 151 - Read Online
P. 151

maxillectomy  and was subsequently  referred to the
          Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Eklavya
          Dental  College  and Hospital, Rajasthan,  India.  Immediate
          surgical reconstruction was not  recommended  given  the
          need for further treatment with radiation therapy. External
          beam postoperative radiotherapy was administered over
          a period of 6  weeks.  The patient  tolerated the  radiation
          well and was subsequently referred to possible prosthetic
          restoration  of the  oral defect after  radiation therapy.
          Examination revealed a partial maxillectomy defect on the
          left side crossing the midline. The left side naso-maxillary
          region was depressed due to bone loss, and this was
          also evident  in  extra  oral examination.  The  defect was
          a Class  IV according to the Aramany Classification of
          Defects [Figure 1]. The patient agreed to have his pictures
                [3]
          published and signed the consent form.              Figure 1: Intraoral view of the maxillectomy defect
          Aesthetic rehabilitation  can be accomplished  either
          surgically or prosthetically.  The choice of rehabilitation
                                 [4]
          depends on the site, size, severity, patient age, and patient
          preference. Contraindications to surgical reconstruction
          include advanced  age, poor  general medical condition, a
          history of radiation therapy, a complex anatomical defect
          and the patient’s refusal to undergo further surgery. [5]
          Various  modalities  for prosthetic  reconstruction were
          discussed with the patient, and he requested  an
          economical  solution. The treatment plan  therefore was
          to provide a plastic-based, light-weight obturator to meet
          the aesthetic demands by replacing bone and teeth while
          assisting phonetics and mastication.
          Procedure
          An irreversible hydrocolloid  was used to make an
          impression  of the  maxillary  defect area  after  blocking all   Figure 2: Blocking of undercuts on master cast by plaster and wax
          undercuts  with  wet  gauge.  The  impression  was  poured,
          and the final cast was obtained, on which a custom tray
          was made using a self-curing autopolymerising resin.
          Border molding for recording the soft tissue borders of
          the defect was carried out using a low-fusing impression
          compound. Additional silicone was used to make a
          wash impression, and  the final master cast was poured.
          All undercuts on the cast were blocked out with plaster
          and wax  [Figure  2]. The  final  denture  base  and occlusal
          wax rims were prepared to record maxillomandibular
          relations.  After the  maxillomandibular jaw  relations
          had been  obtained,  the  record was  articulated,  and
          teeth arrangement was performed. On completion,
          the wax prosthesis was verified at the trial insertion
          appointment.  The  wax  prosthesis  was  invested,  and
          the wax was eliminated  [Figure  3]. A  sheet  of plastic   Figure 3: Master cast after elimination of wax
          based heat cure acrylic polymer in the dough stage
          was placed over the defect and the palatal area on the   salt present in the bulb  [Figure  7], resulting  in a hollow
          master cast. Pressure then applied to the base of the   space inside the bulb. The holes were sealed with a layer
          defect resulted in a cup-shaped  depression of acrylic   of  self-curing  acrylic,  and final  finishing  and polishing  of
          polymer over the  defect  [Figure  4]. Salt was then  used   the prosthesis was done [Figure 8].
          to fill the depression  [Figure  5]. Another thin sheet of   The plastic-based hollow obturator was inserted into the
          acrylic polymer was placed, and packing was performed   defect, and the patient was instructed on home care and
          with conventional prosthodontic protocols. Finally, three   the prosthesis  maintenance.  To sanitize  the wound, the
          to four holes were drilled  on the palatal  surface of the   patient was instructed to gently remove any exudates
          prosthesis covering the bulb  [Figure  6]. Warm water was   with a wet cotton tip soaked with a 5% Betadine solution
          injected  through  the  holes  to  dissolve  and eliminate  the   and to clean the intaglio surface of the prosthesis once
          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 3 || May 15, 2015                                             141
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156