Page 130 - Read Online
P. 130

Original Article                                   Plastic and Aesthetic Research




          Use of the multiplane internal mastopexy


          for ptosis correction revision-augmentation

          mammoplasty





          Umar Daraz Khan , Muhammad Riaz          2
                              1
          1 Department of Aesthetic Surgery, Reshape Clinic, West Malling, Kent, ME19 6QR, UK.
          2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, UK.
          Address for correspondence: Dr. Umar Daraz Khan, Department of Aesthetic Surgery, Reshape Clinic, West Malling, Kent, ME19 6QR, UK.
          E-mail: Mrumarkhan@aol.com

                ABSTRACT
                Aim:  Augmentation mammoplasty is  a  commonly  performed  procedure  with a  high satisfaction
                rate. Multiplane pocket was described for simultaneous internal mastopexy and augmentation using
                inframammary crease incision for selected primary and secondary mammoplasties. The use of the
                technique is presented with a larger experience for correction of ptosis in a patient presenting for
                revision surgery following subglandular augmentation mammoplasty. Methods: A retrospectively
                collected  data were analyzed using the Excel Spread Sheet. A  total of 25  patients had multiplane
                augmentation with the internal mastopexy following augmentation mammoplasty in subglandular
                pocket. Data of 25 patients who had their revision surgery in multiplane were analyzed. Results: The
                group included 25 patients with a mean age of 36.6 years (range: 25-54 years) with mean implant
                duration of 6.4 years (range: 1.5-13 years). Twenty-three of the patients were nonsmokers, 1 smoker
                and 1 patient’s smoking status was not mentioned. Eighteen patients presented with grade I capsular
                contracture, 3 patients with grade II contracture and 4 patients had a combination of grade I and II
                capsular contracture. Pseudoptosis was present in 6, class B ptosis in 6, A/B ptosis in 3, water-down
                deformity in 5 and rippling in 5 patients. Average preoperative size of implant used initially was
                334.4 mL (range: 250-340 mL) and the mean implant size selected for revision surgery was 416 mL
                (range: 260-525 mL). Mean follow-up time was 18 months (range: 6-48 months). Of 25 patients, 21 had
                a bilateral procedure whereas the technique was used unilaterally in 4 patients for the correction of
                asymmetry. All patients had a single dose of intravenous antibiotics and followed by an oral course
                for 5 days, there was no infection noted in the series. In the current series, no patient required revision
                surgery following the multiplane internal mastopexy. Conclusion: Multiplane internal mastopexy can
                be useful in selected cases of revisionary augmentation mammoplasty.

                Key words:
                Breast ptosis, internal mastopexy, mastopexy with augmentation, revision-augmentation mammoplasty


          INTRODUCTION                                        implant related mammoplasties for both primary and
                                                              revision  mammoplasties is  on the  rise  and  is  due  to  the
          Primary and revision-augmentation mammoplasty is    information available on the product, premarket surveys,
          a commonly performed procedure. The incidence of    enhanced implant safety, and regular quality checks.
                                                                                                              [1]
                                                              It is not surprising that augmentation mammoplasty is
                         Access this article online           one of the most commonly performed procedure and
               Quick Response Code:                           in  2012  alone  330,631  implant  related  mammoplasties
                                                                                    [2]
                                   Website:                   were performed in USA.  However, the data represent
                                   www.parjournal.net
                                                              implant-related surgeries performed both for primary and
                                                              secondary surgery making it difficult to obtain number of
                                   DOI:                       secondary or revision mammoplasties performed during
                                   10.4103/2347-9264.157104   the same period of time.  Secondary procedures following
                                                                                   [3]
                                                              mammoplasties can be divided into early or late. Early
           120                                                          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 3 || May 15, 2015
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135