Page 7 - Read Online
P. 7

Page 2 of 9                                               Liang et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2019;6:23  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.33

               untreated, could give rise to disabling physical and psychosocial complications in the long run. Currently,
               the attention on lymphedema is far from enough resulting in delayed initial evaluation and treatment and
               poor prognosis. There is no existing cure for lymphedema and current therapies mainly focus on limiting
               progression and preventing severe complications. Early intervention is proved to be the root of improved
               prognosis thus highlighting the significance of early detection. Various new and effective diagnostic
               methods emerge over the years but there are still no standard guidelines for lymphedema diagnosis, let
               alone early detection. The aim of this review is to provide an objective appraisal of current diagnostic
               methods, focusing on their respective advantages and weaknesses, and hopefully shed some lights on
               developing a practical diagnosis modality beneficial to early detection and clinical decision making of
               lymphedema.


               HISTORY AND MANIFESTATIONS
               For suspected lymphedema patients, history and manifestations are invaluable and indispensable. The
               onset of swelling could be diagnostic for lymphedema. Extremity swelling present for less than 3 months or
               forms soon after lymphatic injury is not consistent with lymphedema. It’s very common to see pediatrics-
                                                                                           [2]
               onset in primary lymphedema, boys’ present in infancy and girls’ during adolescence . For secondary
                                                                                [2]
               lymphedema, travels to parasite-endemic area (filariasis), obesity (BMI > 50) , radical cancer treatment for
               breast, gynaecological, head and neck cancer (nodes dissection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy), nodes
               biopsy can be crucial risk factors, while family history is more frequently seen in primary lymphedema.
               Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has been shown to increase the incidence of breast cancer treatment related
                          [3]
               lymphedema .
               Complaints of extremity heaviness and fatigue could be the main manifestation of early stage lymphedema.
               As it progresses, visible limb swelling and enlargement of circumference take place. Different tools are
               utilized to assess extremity volume/circumference. Tape measurement is applying a flexible and non-stretch
               tape to assess the girth of edematous limb at certain points following different protocols. Absolute values
               are usually converted into volumes using respective mathematical formulae visualizing the limb as a series
                                                            [4]
               of truncated cones, cylinders and trapezoidal solids . Absolute excess volume (affected limb-unaffected
               limb), excess volume in percent [(affected limb-unaffected limb)/unaffected limb × 100], relative value in
               percent (affected limb/unaffected limb × 100) and affected leg volume divided by BMI are useful indices in
               unilateral lymphedema diagnosis. Girth assessment is the most fundamental and commonly used method
               for its feasibility and economical advantages but is limited by its high inter- and intra-observer variability
               and poor reproducibility. In water plethysmography, the amount of water displaced after immersing the
               limb of interest into a water tank equals the extremity volume. It’s considered as the criterion standard
               for lymphedema diagnosis but also deemed impractical in clinical setting for its cumbersome set-up,
               patient-unfriendly measurement protocol and extra contraindications concerning water. Extremity volume
               difference > 10%, volume change > 200 mL or circumference change > 2 cm at one certain point are deemed
                                                                                           [5]
               diagnostic, though there are still no standardized cut-off points among health practioners .
               A square frame emitting infrared lights is used in perometry. As the frame moves along the limb,
               information of the interrupted lights is converted into coordinates to reconstruct a 3D model and
                                             [6]
               automatically calculate the volume . Similarly, three-dimensional imaging systems such as the VECTRA
               XT surface photo imaging system (Canfield Imaging Systems, Fairfield, NJ) are developed to capture 360°
               digital image data of the edematous extremity. Absolute values or image color change by photographs
               contrast presents volume changes before and after treatment, thus making VECTRA valuable in both
                                     [7]
               diagnosis and monitoring . VECTRA, as a relatively new technique provides high resolution images and
                                                                          [7,8]
               might be applied to the whole body, facial and pubic region included . However, both three-dimensional
               photography and perometry are costly and not obtainable in every clinic.
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12