Page 8 - Read Online
P. 8

Liang et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2019;6:23  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.33                                               Page 3 of 9

               As edema persists, difficulty of fitting clothing, joint dysfunction and musculoskeletal agony may appear.
               Characteristic skin changes including peau d’orange (pitted or dimpled skin texture), Kaposi-Stemmer
               sign (the inability to pinch the fold of skin at the base of the second toe) and squared off appearance of
               toes assists to identify lymphedema. Hyperkeratosis and fibrosis with verruca and nodules usually indicate
               advanced stages. Lymphedematous extremity is prone to recurrent infection, cellulitis lymphangitis,
               lymphorrhea and skin ulceration. Angiosarcoma that initially presents itself as red-purple nodules with/
               without satellite lesions is a rare but lethal complication.

               Laboratory examinations such as routine blood test, thyroid function or urinalysis are in need to rule out
               other causes of edema, including renal, heart or hepatic failure etc. Though thorough history, physical and
               laboratory examinations could help to diagnosis > 90% lymphedema patients, lymphedema in early stages
               could be surprisingly challenging to diagnose, making assistant methods necessary for early detection and
               confirmation.

               STAGING
               It’s widely accepted that lymphedema progresses through 4 stages. Stage 0 is the subclinical stage where
               swelling is absent but with impaired lymph transport and possible complaints of discomfort or heaviness.
               Stage 1 is spontaneously reversible edema that subsides with limb elevation, while the swelling of stage 2
               could not be relieved by elevation. Stage 3, also known as lymphostatic elephantiasis, describes nonpitting
                                                                          [2,9]
               edema, fibrosis, hyperkeratosis and the aforementioned complications .

               DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
               Lymphoscintigraphy
               Lymphoscintigraphy has been regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of lymphedema since its first
               introduction. It involves the intradermal or subcutaneous injection into the hand or feet of radiolabeled
               particles usually under the size of 100 nmol/L, such as  99m  Tc (Technetium) human serum albumin
               nanocolloid,   99m  Tc sulfur colloid and  99m  Tc albumin colloid. Gamma camera systems are applied to
               capture the radiopharmaceutical emission as it is taken up and transported by the lymphatic vasculature.
               Lymphoscintigraphy demonstrates the lymphatic vessels efferent from the injected sites and lymph nodes
               along the pathway. Typical abnormalities include formation of collateral lymphatic channels, asymmetric
               visualization of lymphatic channels, delayed or asymmetric node uptake, absent or delayed visualization of
               lymph nodes, unusual visualization of the popliteal or antecubital lymph nodes (compensatory mechanism
               involving deeper lymph pathways) [10,11] .

               Dermal backflow, accumulation of tracer outside the main lymph routes and in cutaneous lymphatices,
               and lymphangiectasia are considered major diagnostic findings for lymphedema. Other than morphologic-
               qualitative information, lymphoscintigraphy provides us with quantitative information of the lymphatics.
               Commonly used parameters consist of TAT (tracer appearance time, the time from injection to the
               appearance of the tracer in the inguinal or axillary lymph nodes, normally < 10 min) and TI (Transport
               Index, normally ranges from 1 to 10).

                              [12]
               Hassanein et al.  in their study including 227 patients (454 limbs) suggested the sensitivity and
               the specificity of lymphoscintigraphy for lymphedema is 96% and 100% respectively. Early primary
               lymphedema may result in false-negative lymphoscintigrams so repeat lymphoscintigraphy is
                           [12]
               recommended . The recently developed Taiwan Lymphoscintigraphy Staging might provide a new angle
                                                   [13]
               of assessing the severity of lymphedema . Lymphoscintigraphy is also valuable in early detection and
               treatment selection, especially surgical planning as it allows to seek out possible functional lymphatic
               vessels for vessels to use for lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA). Compared to lymphangiography, the
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13