Page 22 - Read Online
P. 22

Ong et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2020;7:311-8  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2020.05                 Page 317

               that 10% of the patients experienced infusion-related adverse effects, but we managed to reduce this risk by
               premedicating our patients with IV promethazine, IV hydrocortisone and oral acetaminophen as stated in
               the treatment protocol. In addition, the absence of infection and leukopenia in our cohort of patients may
               be related to the withdrawal of immunomodulators prior to RTX and a delay of reinitiating the therapy for
               two to four weeks after treatment. We acknowledge that our small sample size might not reflect the actual
               safety profile of such an approach, however the absence of major side effects in our cohort of patients is
               promising for our therapeutic plan. We postulate that the lack of adverse events may be due to the absence
               of the cumulative effect of immunomodulators with RTX and the short frequency dosing as reported by
                    [22]
               others .

               Nevertheless, there are several limitations to our study. Firstly, being a retrospective study, the analysis of
               data from medical records was subjected to recording bias. In addition, the patient group at baseline was
               heterogenous with regard to their pre-RTX status and have variable disease duration, number of relapses
               and EDSS severity. Oral immunosuppressant maintenance therapies and steroid doses following RTX
               treatment were also variable. Although our results were derived from a tertiary care institution, our sample
               size was small, which further highlights the challenges of access to RTX at tertiary establishments in a
               resource-limited setting.

               In conclusion, pulse induction therapy with a single course of RTX followed by subsequent de-escalation to
               oral immunosuppressants may be a convenient and economical approach in managing NMOSD patients.
               In resource-limited hospitals with restricted access to RTX, such an approach can potentially be effective to
               reduce relapses and improve EDSS scores with minimal side effects. This treatment plan allowed adequate
               time for optimization of other oral medications to achieve their therapeutic benefits. Moreover, the ability
               to achieve and maintain remission suggests that RTX has long-term effects extending beyond treatment
               discontinuation. Nevertheless, we concede that a further, larger prospective cohort study is required to
               demonstrate the efficacy of such a treatment approach.

               DECLARATIONS

               Acknowledgments
               The authors would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for the permission to publish this
               paper.

               Authors’ contributions
               Performed data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, prepared the manuscript, Tables and Figures: Ong
               TL
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Viswanathan S
               Performed data acquisition, analysis and interpretation. Contributed in manuscript preparation: Ong S,
               Hiew FL


               Availability of data and materials
               All data used for this study were collected as part of ongoing work under the auspices of the Demyelinating
               Disease Database, established at the Neurology Department of Kuala Lumpur Hospital.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27