Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37

Page 8 of 10             Min et al. Metab Target Organ Damage 2023;3:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mtod.2023.09

                                                                                         2
               empagliflozin) for people with T2DM and CKD if eGFR ≥ 20 mL/min per 1.73m . Once an SGLT-2
               inhibitor is commenced, it is reasonable to continue even if the renal function declines (i.e., eGFR falls
                                       2
                                                                                [33]
               below 20 mL/min per 1.73m  ) unless it is poorly tolerated or RRT is initiated .
               When SGLT inhibitors were first launched, there were concerns about the safety profile regarding adverse
               events such as acute kidney injury, volume depletion, hypotension, amputation, and fractures. However,
               long-term prospective studies did not support these concerns and have not demonstrated a significantly
               increased risk [34,35] . Dedicated renal outcome studies subsequently confirmed a reno-protective effect. The
               CREDENCE study did not confirm an increased risk of amputation with canagliflozin as reported by the
               CANVAS program. In fact, people with T2DM and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) benefit more from
                                                                [36]
               SGLT-2 inhibitors, compared with those without PAD . Regarding GLP-1RAs, the adverse events of
               interest included medullary thyroid cancer, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer but data from the CVOTs
               did not indicate that there is an increased risk of these outcomes . Worsening of diabetic retinopathy
                                                                         [37]
               events observed in the SUSTAIN-6 trial (only) is thought to be related to the magnitude and rapidity of
               glucose reduction in people with higher baseline HbA1c and pre-existing retinopathy .
                                                                                       [38]
               CONCLUSIONS
               There is unequivocal evidence for CV benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs from CVOTs, and this
               has led to major changes in the management of hyperglycaemia in people with T2DM). Both GLP-1RAs
               and SLGT-2 inhibitors have illustrated a role beyond the glucose-lowering effect. They both have
               demonstrated a beneficiary effect on CV risk factors such as weight and blood pressure [39,40] . With regard to
               lipid metabolism, GLP-1RAs were associated with slight reductions in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and
                                                                         [41]
               LDL cholesterol but no significant impact on HDL cholesterol , whereas SGLT-2 inhibitors were
               associated with a reduction in triglycerides and an increase in HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol .
                                                                                                       [42]
               International guidelines recommend these agents for people with T2DM and established CVD/ or multiple
               CV risk factors, independent of HbA1c level and metformin use. However, there is clinical inertia that has
               slowed the adoption of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs into routine clinical practice . The effective
                                                                                            [43]
               translation of CVOT evidence and modern guidelines into routine clinical practice will need educational
               tools, implementation programmes and raising awareness amongst healthcare professionals of the potential
               benefit for patients.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the review article: Min T, Bain SC
               Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and final approval of the version
               to be published: Min T, Bain SC, Crockett E, Pavlou A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               E Crockett and A Pavlou have nothing to disclose. SC Bain reports grants and personal fees from
               AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi-Aventis; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and
               Merck Sharp & Dohme; grants from Medscape; expert advice provided to All-Wales Medicines Strategy
               Group and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence UK; and partnership in Glycosmedia. T Min
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42