Page 32 - Read Online
P. 32

Tschuor et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:72                    Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2020.39




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and
               splenopancreatectomy: technical aspects and

               review of literature


               Christoph Tschuor, Sushruta S. Nagarkatti, Patrick N. Salibi, Dionisios Vrochides, John B. Martinie

               Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.

               Correspondence to: Prof. John B. Martinie, Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.
               E-mail: john.martinie@atriumhealth.org
               How to cite this article: Tschuor C, Nagarkatti SS, Salibi PN, Vrochides D, Martinie JB. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy and
               splenopancreatectomy: technical aspects and review of literature. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:72.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.39

               Received: 27 Apr 2020    First Decision: 23 Jun 2020    Revised: 3 Sep 2020    Accepted: 29 Sep 2020    Published: 21 Oct 2020
               Academic Editor: Giulio Belli    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract
               Robotic pancreatic surgery provides several advantages. Since the first report of a robotic-assisted distal
               pancreatectomy in 2001, total pancreatectomies, pancreatic tumor enucleations, pancreaticoduodenectomy,
               central pancreatectomy and Appleby procedures have been performed, indicating a promising future. The
               aim of this article is to describe our experience of robotic pancreatic surgery including technical aspects for
               pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. The current literature on feasibility, safety and early
               postoperative outcomes will be discussed.


               Keywords: Robotic, pancreatectomy, distal, duodenopancreatectomy, Whipple




               INTRODUCTION
               Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatic surgery has decreased over the last decades because
               of advances in anesthesia, critical care and other aspects of perioperative management. Improvement in
               surgical technique and instrumentation as well as centralization of care to high-volume pancreatic surgery
                                                                                                     [1]
               centers has significantly contributed to improvement in postoperative short- and long-term outcomes .




                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.misjournal.net
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37