Page 54 - Read Online
P. 54

Page 8 of 9                                           Phillips et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:12  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.02


               Conflicts of interest
               Phillips JD has previously received consulting fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. but has no ongoing
               relationship. All other authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest related to this work.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The study was reviewed by the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects of Dartmouth-Hitchcock
               Medical Center and approved.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Zirafa C, Aprile V, Ricciardi S, Romano G, Davini F, et al. Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy.
                   Surg Endosc 2019;33:153-8.
               2.   Toker A, Özyurtkan MO, Demirhan O, Ayalp K, Kaba E, et al. Lymph node dissection in surgery for lung cancer: comparison of open
                   vs. video-assisted vs. robotic-assisted approaches. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;22:284-90.
               3.   Liang H, Liang W, Zhao L, Chen D, Zhang J, et al. Robotic versus video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer: a meta-
                   analysis. Ann Surg 2018;268:254-9.
               4.   Cerfolio RJ, Ghanim AF, Dylewski M, Veronesi G, Spaggiari L, et al. The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell
                   lung cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:778-86.
               5.   Zirafa CC, Cavaliere I, Ricciardi S, Romano G, Davini F, et al. Long-term oncologic results for robotic major lung resection in non-
                   small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Surg Oncol 2019;28:223-7.
               6.   Kneuertz PJ, D’Souza DM, Richardson M, Abdel-Rasoul M, Moffatt-Bruce SD, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic
                   lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approach. Clin Lung
                   Cancer 2019; Epub ahead of print [PMID: 31685354 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.10.004]
               7.   Pearlstein DP. Robotic lobectomy utilizing the robotic stapler. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:e591-3.
               8.   Galetta D, Casiraghi M, Pardolesi A, Borri A, Spaggiari L. New stapling devices in robotic surgery. J Vis Surg 2017;3:45.
               9.   Kim MP, Nguyen DT, Meisenbach LM, Graviss EA, Chan EY. Da Vinci Xi robot decreases the number of thoracotomy cases in
                   pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:145-53.
               10.  Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336
                   patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
               11.  Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-
                   year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-96.
               12.  STS National Database 2018. General thoracic surgery database training manual. Available from: https://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/
                   content/GTSDTrainingManual_September24_2018.pdf [Last accessed on 11 Feb 2020]
               13.  Phillips JD, Finley DJ. Editorial on expanded indications for robotic surgery in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis
                   2019;11 (Suppl 9):S1172-4.
               14.  Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P, Melfi F, Schmid RA, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung
                   cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:19-25.
               15.  Cerfolio RJ. Total port approach for robotic lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2014;24:151-6.
               16.  Kim MP, Chan EY. “Five on a dice” port placement for robot-assisted thoracoscopic right upper lobectomy using robotic stapler. J
                   Thorac Dis 2017;9:5355-62.
               17.  Khan N, Fikfak V, Chan EY, Kim MP. “Five on a dice” port placement allows for successful robot-assisted left pneumonectomy. Thorac
                   Cardiovasc Surg Rep 2017;6:e42-4.
               18.  Guo F, Ma D, Li S. Compare the prognosis of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery
                   (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e17089.
               19.  Attaar A, Tam V, Nason KS. Risk factors for prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann
                   Surg 2019; Epub ahead of print [PMID: 31577547 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003560]
               20.  Seder CW, Basu S, Ramsay T, Rocco G, Blackmon S, et al. A Prolonged air leak score for lung cancer resection: an analysis of the
                   society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg 2019;108:1478-83.
               21.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health. A report of the surgeon general. preventing tobacco use
                   among youth and young adults: we can make the next generation tobacco-free. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_
                   statistics/sgr/2012/consumer_booklet/index.htm [Last accessed on 11 Feb 2020]
               22.  Lampalo M, Majer M, Jukić I, Stanić HS, Barišić B, et al. Health sequelae of tobacco exposure in childhood and adolescence. Psychiatr
                   Danub 2019;31 (Suppl 1):39-43.
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59