Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Tropiano et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:17  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.41  Page 3 of 15

               In the present work, we evaluate a monoinstitutional series of NV-SCC treated with IRT through anatomic
               implantation (“anatomic IRT”) and focus on specific toxicities and strategies to avoid them.

               METHODS
               Patients
               Patients with NV-SCC, treated between March 2022 and October 2023 with IRT within the North Sardinia
               Tumor Board, involving the Otolaryngology Division of the University Hospital of Sassari and the
               Radiation Oncology Division of Mater Olbia Hospital, have been included. This study adhered to the ethical
               principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was not mandated by Italian law (GU
               No. 76, 31 March 2008) due to its observational retrospective design. Informed consent for the procedure
               and photographic documentation were obtained.


               The minimal required work-up included physical examination, rhinoscopy, rigid nasal endoscopy, neck
               ultrasound performed by the head and neck surgeon (FB) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography
               (CT) of the face, neck and chest. Whenever the actual spread in soft tissues of the nose/cheek/superior lip
               was not clearly defined, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) completed the diagnostic work-up of the
               primary tumor. In case of doubts concerning lymph nodes at imaging, an ultrasound-guided fine needle
               aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the suspicious node(s) was performed.


               For staging purposes, we used both the Rome Classification and the UICC/AJCC system for T, and the
                                                [42]
               UICC/AJCC system for N classification .

               Treatment modalities
               A variable number of 6-Fr flexible implant tubes were inserted using metal guide channels [Figure 1] and
               fixed by buttons that can be anchored to the skin by stitches and are anyway going to be adherent to
               increase the reliability of the treatment plan [Figure 2]. The implants are best applied under general
               anesthesia; orotracheal intubation is preferred and a laryngeal mask should be avoided to minimize the
               hindrance by the anesthesiology tube which should be stabilized as far away as possible from the operating
               field. The implantation was performed by a head and neck surgeon in the presence of experienced IRT
               radiation oncologists.


               Infiltration of the subperichondral planes with local anesthetics, with or without adrenaline, as in functional
               nose surgery, is fundamental to obtain analgesia in case of local anesthesia and is helpful in facilitating the
               optimal catheter path along the planes avoiding piercing of the mucoperichondrium. The exact
               configuration and number of catheters is tailored to the extent, depth, and shape of the lesion according to
               pre-implant MRI or CT scan, clinical experience, work-up data, and intraoperative findings. The dose is
               prescribed after implant encompassing the full clinical target volume (CTV) and sparing as much as
               possible the surrounding healthy structures. For this reason, interaction between the surgeon and the IRT
               radiation oncologist is always recommended at the implantation phase in the surgical theater.

               Anatomic implantation
               With this technique, a “fully interstitial” implant is preferable. However, when this approach is insufficient
               for adequate CTV coverage by overreaching all the limits of the lesion, alternative methods can be used to
               obtain complete coverage and stabilize the tubes. A scenario may be the presence of a bulky skin spread,
               which can be approached with a “contact” strategy, by placing the tubes on the skin in the area of such
               exophytic spread [Figure 3]. A different, very common situation is the extension of the lesion posterior to
               the limit of the NV, which is the plane tangential to the piriform opening [4,42] . If this extension is limited and
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78