Page 67 - Read Online
P. 67

Page 10 of 13              Tang et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:24  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.04

               CONCLUSION
               The treatment of SNMTs is complex and should be patient-specific. Decision-making for patients with
               SNMTs should include a multidisciplinary team of neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, neuroradiologists,
               radiation and medical oncologists, and histopathologists. Additionally, discussions around treatment should
               include factors such as SNMT histology, size, location, stage, and extent of involvement of the skull base.
               Surgical treatment continues to focus on the goal of achieving negative margins. With the continued
               advancement of endoscopic endonasal approaches, EES has become more commonly included in the skull
               base surgeon’s armamentarium when caring for patients with SNMTs. Studies have found that EES can
               provide similar oncologic outcomes in many SNMTs compared to open approaches while improving
               postoperative quality of life and decreasing morbidity. At experienced EES centers, open approaches can be
               reserved for tumor extending beyond the anatomic reach of the approach (lateral to mid orbit or optic,
               anterior to the posterior table of frontal sinus). In conclusion, the EES is an effective option and plays a
               strong role in treating SNMTs with skull base involvement with a goal of margin-negative resection.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Tang A, Adida S, Choby G, Gardner PA
               Performed data acquisition and provided administrative, technical, and material support: Tang A, Choby G,
               Gardner PA
               Draft preparation: Tang A, Adida S
               Supervision and revisions: Gardner PA, Choby G

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Not applicable.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Data and imaging were de-identified, so institutional review board approval from the University of Pittsburgh
               was not required.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Antognoni P, Bossi P, Locatelli D. Sinonasal malignancies of anterior skull base:
                   histology-driven treatment strategies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016;49:183-200.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Snyderman CH, Kassam AB. Endoscopic techniques for pathology of the anterior cranial fossa and ventral skull base. J Am Coll Surg
                   2006;202:563.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: sinonasal tumors. Int Forum
                   Allergy Rhinol 2024;14:149-608.  DOI  PubMed
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72