Page 31 - Read Online
P. 31

Poulos et al. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025;9:6                    Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2024.42



               Review                                                                        Open Access



               The current state of artificial intelligence in robotic

               esophageal surgery


                                                                                2
                                   1
                                                1
                                                                1
               Constantine M. Poulos , Ryan Cassidy , Eamon Khatibifar , Erik Holzwanger , Lana Schumacher 1
               1
                Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
               2
                Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts School of
               Medicine, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Lana Schumacher, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts School of Medicine, 800
               Washington Avenue, Boston, MA 02116, USA. E-mail: Lana.Schumacher@tuftsmedicine.org
               How to cite this article: Poulos CM, Cassidy R, Khatibifar E, Holzwanger E, Schumacher L. The current state of artificial
               intelligence in robotic esophageal surgery. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025;9:6. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.42
               Received: 10 May 2024  First Decision: 21 Nov 2024  Revised: 23 Dec 2024  Accepted: 5 Feb 2025  Published: 12 Feb 2025

               Academic Editors: Farid Gharagozloo, Itasu Ninomiya  Copy Editor: Ting-Ting Hu  Production Editor: Ting-Ting Hu

               Abstract
               Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly utilized as a tool for physicians to optimize medical care and
               patient outcomes. The multifaceted approach to managing esophageal cancer provides a perfect opportunity for
               machine learning to support clinicians in all stages of management. Preoperatively, AI may aid gastroenterologists
               and surgeons in diagnosing and prognosticating premalignant or early-stage lesions. Intraoperatively, AI may also
               aid surgeons in identifying anatomic structures or minimize the learning curve for new learners. Postoperatively,
               machine learning algorithms can help predict complications and guide high-risk patients through recovery. While
               still evolving, AI holds promise in enhancing the efficiency and efficacy of multidisciplinary esophageal cancer care.

               Keywords: Artificial intelligence, machine learning, neural network, esophagectomy, robotic



               INTRODUCTION
               The treatment of esophageal malignancy is complex and requires coordination among a multidisciplinary
               team including gastroenterologists, medical and radiation oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. Similar to its
               applications in lung cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are increasingly
               used to guide clinicians in all stages of esophageal cancer management, from diagnosis to non-operative
               management and surgical intervention . The algorithms are trained on large amounts of clinical data and
                                                [1-4]






                           © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                        www.oaepublish.com/mis
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36