Page 29 - Read Online

Page 8 of 9 Murillo et al. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025;9:7 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.55

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.

REFERENCES
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36
cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-49. DOI
2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer stat facts: esophageal cancer.https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/
esoph.html. (accessed 2025-02-14).
3. van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al; CROSS Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional
cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074-84. DOI
4. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al; CROSS study group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery
alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090-
8. DOI
5. Mertens AC, Kalff MC, Eshuis WJ, Van Gulik TM, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS; Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit group.
Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Ann
Surg Oncol. 2021;28:175-83. DOI PubMed PMC
6. Khaitan PG, Vekstein AM, Thibault D, et al. Robotic esophagectomy trends and early surgical outcomes: the US experience. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2023;115:710-7. DOI
7. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal
cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887-92. DOI
8. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the
previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017;266:232-6. DOI
9. van Workum F, Stenstra MHBC, Berkelmans GHK, et al. Learning curve and associated morbidity of minimally invasive
esophagectomy: a retrospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2019;269:88-94. DOI
10. van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open
transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:621-30. DOI
11. Babic B, Müller DT, Jung JO, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive
esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center. Surg Endosc.
2022;36:7747-55. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Fujita T, Sato K, Ozaki A, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of the short-term outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive
esophagectomy versus conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2022;46:1926-33.
DOI
13. Morimoto Y, Kawakubo H, Ishikawa A, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended
lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center
retrospective study. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022;15:270-8. DOI
14. Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al. Lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications following robot-assisted
minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched comparison to conventional minimally invasive
esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:639-47. DOI
15. Ekeke CN, Kuiper GM, Luketich JD, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally
invasive esophagectomy: a propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;166:374-
82.e1. DOI PubMed PMC
16. Zhang Y, Dong D, Cao Y, et al. Robotic versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-
analysis. Ann Surg. 2023;278:39-50. DOI
17. Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Casas MA, et al. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-
thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2021;170:1692-701. DOI
18. Huang Y, Zhao YL, Song JD. Early outcomes with robot-assisted vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:7887-97. DOI PubMed
19. Zhou J, Xu J, Chen L, et al. McKeown esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic
review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2022;35:doac011. DOI
20. Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MDP, et al. New insights into the surgical anatomy of the esophagus. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:S675-80. DOI
PubMed PMC
21. Hoelzen JP, Fortmann L, Roy D, et al. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy with total mesoesophageal excision enhances R0-resection in
patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience. Surgery. 2024;176:721-9. DOI
22. Kang CH, Yun TY, Park JH, et al. Long-term survival analysis of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus.
2024;37:doae054. DOI