Page 38 - Read Online

Magaribuchi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:6 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.81 Page 7 of 8

REFERENCES
1. Marchioni M, Preisser F, Bandini M, et al. Comparison of partial versus radical nephrectomy effect on other-cause mortality, cancer-
specific mortality, and 30-day mortality in patients older than 75 years. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5:467-73. DOI PubMed
2. Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer
2009;115:1465-71. DOI PubMed
3. Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European association of urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update.
Eur Urol 2022;82:399-410. DOI PubMed
4. Fong KY, Gan VHL, Lim BJH, et al. Off-clamp vs on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. BJU Int 2024;133:375-86. DOI PubMed
5. Bertolo R, Autorino R, Simone G, et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors: a multicenter
analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group). Eur Urol 2018;74:226-32. DOI PubMed
6. Delto JC, Paulucci D, Helbig MW, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for large renal masses: a multi-institutional series. BJU Int
2018;121:908-15. DOI PubMed
7. Vartolomei MD, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy mid-term oncologic outcomes: a systematic
review. J Clin Med 2022;11:6165. DOI PubMed PMC
8. Springer C, Hoda MR, Fajkovic H, et al. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term
oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients. BJU Int 2013;111:281-8. DOI PubMed
9. Mullerad M, Kastin A, Adusumilli PS, Moskovitz B, Sabo E, Nativ O. Comparison of nephron-sparing surgery in central versus
peripheral renal tumors. Urology 2005;65:467-72. DOI PubMed
10. Qin B, Hu H, Lu Y, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for intrarenal tumors. PLoS One
2018;13:e0195911. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Checcucci E, Piazza P, Micali S, et al. Three-dimensional model reconstruction: the need for standardization to drive tailored surgery.
Eur Urol 2022;81:129-31. DOI PubMed
12. Fan G, Li J, Li M, et al. Three-dimensional physical model-assisted planning and navigation for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in
patients with endophytic renal tumors. Sci Rep 2018;8:582. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Amparore D, Pecoraro A, Checcucci E, et al. 3D imaging technologies in minimally invasive kidney and prostate cancer surgery:
which is the urologists’ perception? Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022;74:178-85. DOI PubMed
14. Piramide F, Kowalewski KF, Cacciamani G, et al; European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists and the European
Section of Uro-Technology. Three-dimensional model-assisted minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: a systematic review with
meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol Oncol 2022;5:640-50. DOI PubMed
15. Bertolo R, Kuusk T, Mir MC; Kidney Cancer EAU Edu Platform UROONCO. Three-dimensional models-assisted minimally-invasive
partial nephrectomy: looking forward to more evidence. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023;75:665-6. DOI PubMed
16. Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, et al; ESUT Research Group. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-
assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception. World J Urol 2018;36:201-7. DOI
PubMed
17. Maddox MM, Feibus A, Liu J, Wang J, Thomas R, Silberstein JL. 3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for
individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study. J Robot Surg 2018;12:27-33. DOI PubMed
18. Fan G, Meng Y, Zhu S, et al. Three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors. J Int Med
Res 2019;47:4324-32. DOI PubMed PMC
19. Yamazaki M, Takayama T, Fujita A, et al. 3D printed kidney model could be an important educational tool for residents. Asian J
Endosc Surg 2023;16:197-202. DOI PubMed
20. Fujisaki A, Takayama T, Yamazaki M, et al. Utilization of a three-dimensional printed kidney model for favorable TRIFECTA
achievement in early experience of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2020;9:2697-704. DOI PubMed PMC
21. Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted
surgery. Eur Urol 2016;69:1065-80. DOI PubMed
22. Michiels C, Khene ZE, Prudhomme T, et al. 3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity
score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51). World J Urol 2023;41:303-13. DOI PubMed
23. Kihara K, Saito K, Komai Y, Fujii Y. Integrated image monitoring system using head-mounted display for gasless single-port
clampless partial nephrectomy. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2014;9:634-7. DOI PubMed PMC
24. Wu X, Jiang C, Wu G, et al. Comparison of three dimensional reconstruction and conventional computer tomography angiography in
patients undergoing zero-ischemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BMC Med Imaging 2020;20:47. DOI PubMed PMC
25. Ukimura O, Gill IS. Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience. J Endourol 2008;22:803-10. DOI PubMed
26. Li L, Zeng X, Yang C, Un W, Hu Z. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and navigation in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy
(RAPN) for renal masses in the solitary kidney: a comparative study. Int J Med Robot 2022;18:e2337. DOI PubMed
27. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Three-dimensional augmented reality robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in case of
complex tumours (PADUA ≥10): a new intraoperative tool overcoming the ultrasound guidance. Eur Urol 2020;78:229-38. DOI
PubMed
28. Teber D, Guven S, Simpfendörfer T, et al. Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial
nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. Eur Urol 2009;56:332-8. DOI PubMed