Page 58 - Read Online
P. 58

Page 10 of 11            Jacoby et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:58  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.58

               In summary, we here present our initial series of robotic resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Our results
               indicate that with adequate surgical experience, this operation can be performed safely with excellent
               outcomes. The main limitation of this study is that it was not a comparative study: we did not compare our
               results with those of an open surgery control group. Another limitation was the small cohort of 21 patients,
               which is unsurprising given the rarity of this disease. However, this is the largest published Western cohort
               of patients undergoing robotic surgery for Klatskin tumors and it presents various benefits in perioperative
               outcomes without compromising oncological outcomes. As this technology keeps growing and advancing,
               we believe that the use of a robotic platform will become an alternative approach, not only for major liver
               operations but also for resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Jacoby H, Rayman S, Ross S, Rosemurgy A, Sucandy I
               Performed data acquisition and data analysis, and provided administrative, technical, and material support:
               Crespo K, Syblis C


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               Not applicable.


               Conflicts of interest
               Ross S: Reports educational (personal fees and non-financial support) relationship with Intuitive Surgical
               Incorporated, outside the submitted work. All other authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               All participants were properly consented, and the study was approved by the IRB (1302427).

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G, Buard JL. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of 552
                   extrahepatic bile duct cancers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:128-34.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 1996;224:463.
                   DOI
               3.       Dondossola D, Ghidini M, Grossi F, Rossi G, Foschi D. Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar
                   cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:3542-61.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Anderson  B,  Doyle  MBM.  Surgical  considerations  of  hilar  cholangiocarcinoma.  Surg  Oncol  Clin  N  Am  2019;28:601-17.
                   PubMed
               5.       Cipriani F, Ratti F, Fiorentini G, Reineke R, Aldrighetti L. Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-
                   invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg 2021;73:359-77.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Duarte VC, Coelho FF, Valverde A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score
                   matching analysis. BMC Surg 2020;20:260.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               7.       Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX, et al. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary
                   liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 1:1 matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021;124:560-71.  DOI  PubMed
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63