Page 51 - Read Online
P. 51

Page 175                Kamal et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2024;8:162-85  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2023.55


               progression of the disease. These microRNAs play a crucial role in the control of lipid homeostasis, and
               their dysregulation has been linked to the development of fatty liver disease. RG-125, by modulating
               miR-103/107 activity, has shown potential in preclinical studies to mitigate liver fat accumulation and
               inflammation, offering a new avenue for the development of therapeutic interventions. The exploration of
               RG-125 and its impact on miR-103/107 highlights the intricate molecular mechanisms involved in the
               pathogenesis and underscores the potential of targeted therapies in addressing this increasingly prevalent
               health concern .
                            [129]

               MRX34
               MRX34, a miR-34a mimic, represented an innovative approach in the field of RNA therapeutics by aiming
               to supplement the tumor-suppressive functions of the microRNA known as miR-34a. MiR-34 plays a
               pivotal role in regulating gene expression, particularly in the context of inhibiting cancer cell proliferation
               and promoting apoptosis. The initial excitement surrounding MRX34 stemmed from its potential to mimic
               the actions of miR-34a, thereby harnessing the natural mechanisms that control cellular processes and
               suppress cancer development. However, the progress of clinical studies with MRX34 was abruptly halted
               due to unforeseen severe immune-related adverse events observed in multiple patients. This unexpected
               outcome raised concerns about the safety profile of the miR-34a mimic and underscored the challenges and
               complexities associated with the development of RNA-based therapeutics in the quest for innovative cancer
               treatments .
                        [130]

               A summary of different types of RNA therapeutics and their related commercialized and in-development
               drugs are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1, respectively.


               CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS OF LncRNA THERAPEUTIC DEVELOPMENT
               As of now, no lncRNA-based therapeutics have entered clinical trials in any phase. Despite this, the
               promising potential of lncRNAs as a therapeutic approach suggests that their entry into clinical trials is on
               the horizon [106,136] . Nevertheless, the development of lncRNA-based therapeutics must navigate challenges
               and limitations to maximize therapeutic efficacy and ensure the successful translation of these innovative
               approaches into clinical applications.

               Cross-species sequence variation
               The sequence variation in lncRNA sequences that is present between humans and animal models used for
               experimentation can make it difficult to create effective therapeutics. Drugs found through testing on
               human cells may not work when tested on rodents or other disease models, as lncRNAs may have different
               functions in humans compared to other animals. To overcome this, animal models might have to be altered
               to express the same lncRNA present in humans. However, this would be a difficult task as it would require a
               thorough understanding of the lncRNA and its target gene interactions .
                                                                           [137]
               Optimum silencing strategy
               Silencing genes can be used to study the function of a lncRNA through the use of antisense oligonucleotides
               or double-stranded RNAs. However, silencing lncRNAs is more complex than silencing mRNA because the
               subcellular localization of lncRNAs varies and different silencing strategies have varying effectiveness.
               Antisense oligonucleotides are more effective in targeting RNAs located in the cell nucleus, while double-
               stranded RNAs are better for RNAs in the cytoplasm. This suggests that if a target RNA is expected to
               perform a role in the nucleus, antisense oligonucleotides would be the best silencing method, while double-
               stranded RNAs would be better for targets thought to function in the cytoplasm [138,139] .
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56