Page 34 - Read Online
P. 34

Zhang et al. J Mater Inf 2024;4:34  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.64     Page 27 of 28

               47.      Fernandes LC. Programming computational electromagnetic applications assisted by large language models [Em Programmer’s
                   Notebook]. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 2024;66:63-71.  DOI
               48.      Peng D, Zheng L, Liu D, et al. Large-language models facilitate discovery of the molecular signatures regulating sleep and activity.
                   Nat Commun 2024;15:3685.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               49.      Karnalim O, Toba H, Johan MC. Detecting AI assisted submissions in introductory programming via code anomaly. Educ Inf Technol
                   2024;29:16841-66.  DOI
               50.      Zheng Y. Optimization of computer programming based on mathematical models of artificial intelligence algorithms. Comput Electr
                   Eng 2023;110:108834.  DOI
               51.      Wang WY, Zhang S, Li G, et al. Artificial intelligence enabled smart design and manufacturing of advanced materials: the endless
                            +
                   Frontier in AI  era. MGE Advances 2024;2:e56.  DOI
               52.      Chen L, Chen Z, Yao X, et al. High-entropy alloy catalysts: high-throughput and machine learning-driven design. J Mater Inf
                   2022;2:19.  DOI
               53.      Song G, Diao Z, Lv X, Liu L. TIG and laser–TIG hybrid filler wire welding of casting and wrought dissimilar magnesium alloy. J
                   Manuf Process 2018;34:204-14.  DOI
               54.      Weman K. 1 - Introduction to welding. In: Welding processes handbook (Second Edition). Woodhead Publishing; 2012. p.1-12.
                   Available from: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/welding-processes-handbook/weman/978-0-85709-510-7. [Last accessed on 26 Dec
                   2024].
               55.      Zhang D, Liu Y, Liu R, et al. Characterization of corrosion behavior of TA2 titanium alloy welded joints in seawater environment.
                   Front Chem 2022;10:950768.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               56.      Lei T, Wu C, Rong Y, Huang Y. The development of tube-to-tubesheet welding from automation to digitization. Int J Adv Manuf
                   Technol 2021;116:779-802.  DOI
               57.      Jin Z, Li H, Zhang C, Wang Q, Gao H. Online welding path detection in automatic tube-to-tubesheet welding using passive vision. Int
                   J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;90:3075-84.  DOI
               58.      Mu H, He F, Yuan L, Commins P, Ding D, Pan Z. A digital shadow approach for enhancing process monitoring in wire arc additive
                   manufacturing using sensor fusion. J Ind Inf Integr 2024;40:100609.  DOI
               59.      Pires J, Smith JS, Balfour C. Real-time top-face vision based control of weld pool size. Ind Robot 2005;32:334-40.  DOI
               60.      Ugender S. Influence of tool pin profile and rotational speed on the formation of friction stir welding zone in AZ31 magnesium alloy. J
                   Magnes Alloy 2018;6:205-13.  DOI
               61.      Lin Q, Yang S, Yang R, Wu H. Transistor modeling based on LM-BPNN and CG-BPNN for the GaAs pHEMT. Int J Numerl Model
                   EL 2024;37:e3268.  DOI
               62.      Wang X, Sun L, Bai H, Yu K, Wang B. SCARA mechanical fault identification based on WPM-SE+BPNN method. Meas Sci Technol
                   2022;33:085007.  DOI
               63.      Lee S, Kim H, Lieu QX, Lee J. CNN-based image recognition for topology optimization. Knowl Based Syst 2020;198:105887.  DOI
               64.      Zhang Y, You D, Gao X, Zhang N, Gao PP. Welding defects detection based on deep learning with multiple optical sensors during
                   disk laser welding of thick plates. J Manuf Syst 2019;51:87-94.  DOI
               65.      Liu T, Zheng H, Zheng P, et al. An expert knowledge-empowered CNN approach for welding radiographic image recognition. Adv
                   Eng Inform 2023;56:101963.  DOI
               66.      Wang Z, Cao B, Liu J. Hyperspectral image classification via spatial shuffle-based convolutional neural network. Remote Sens
                   2023;15:3960.  DOI
               67.      Dai F, Wen B, Hu Y, Gu X. A deep neural network potential model for transition metal diborides. J Mater Inf 2024;4:10.  DOI
               68.      He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
                   Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2016 Jun 27-30; Las Vegas, USA. IEEE; 2016. pp. 770-8.  DOI
               69.      Zhu H, Sun M, Fu H, Du N, Zhang J. Training a seismogram discriminator based on ResNet. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens
                   2021;59:pp.7076-85.  DOI
               70.      Howard AG, Zhu M, Chen B, et al. MobileNets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv 2017,
                   arXiv.1704.04861. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.04861 (accessed 26 Dec 2024)
               71.      Liu Z, Zhang X, Shen Z, Wei Y, Cheng KT, Sun J. Joint multi-dimension pruning via numerical gradient update. IEEE Trans Image
                   Process 2021;30:8034-45.  DOI
               72.      Ma S, Zhang Q, Li T, Song H. Basic motion behavior recognition of single dairy cow based on improved Rexnet 3D network. Comput
                   Electron Agr 2022;194:106772.  DOI
               73.      Han K, Wang Y, Chen H, et al. A survey on vision transformer. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2023;45:87-110.  DOI
               74.      Sun W, Qin Z, Deng H, et al. Vicinity vision transformer. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2023;45:12635-49.  DOI
               75.      Lv P, Xu H, Zhang Q, et al. An improved lightweight ConvNeXt for rice classification. Alex Eng J 2025;112:84-97.  DOI
               76.      Zhu J, Feng Y, Liu Q, et al. An improved ConvNeXt with multimodal transformer for physiological signal classification. IEEE Access
                   2024.  DOI
               77.      Hendrycks D, Gimpel K. Gaussian error linear units (GELUs). arXiv ;2016, arXiv:1606.08415. Available online: https://doi.org/10.
                   48550/arXiv.1606.08415 (accessed 26 Dec 2024).
               78.      Lee M, Wu Q. Mathematical analysis and performance evaluation of the GELU activation function in deep learning. J Math
                   2023;2023:1-13.  DOI
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39