Page 109 - Read Online
P. 109

Wu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 15  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.67   Page 13 of 15

               31.       Willatt, M. J.; Musil, F.; Ceriotti, M. Feature optimization for atomistic machine learning yields a data-driven construction of the
                    periodic table of the elements. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 29661-8.  DOI  PubMed
               32.       Jäger, M. O. J.; Morooka, E. V.; Federici, C. F.; Himanen, L.; Foster, A. S. Machine learning hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters
                    through structural descriptors. npj. Comput. Mater. 2018, 4, 96.  DOI
               33.       De, S.; Bartók, A. P.; Csányi, G.; Ceriotti, M. Comparing molecules and solids across structural and alchemical space. Phys. Chem.
                    Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13754-69.  DOI  PubMed
               34.       Mai, H.; Le, T. C.; Chen, D.; Winkler, D. A.; Caruso, R. A. Machine learning for electrocatalyst and photocatalyst design and
                    discovery. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 13478-515.  DOI
               35.       Nørskov, J. K.; Rossmeisl, J.; Logadottir, A.; et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys.
                    Chem. B. 2004, 108, 17886-92.  DOI
               36.       Motagamwala, A. H.; Ball, M. R.; Dumesic, J. A. Microkinetic analysis and scaling relations for catalyst design. Annu. Rev. Chem.
                    Biomol. Eng. 2018, 9, 413-50.  DOI  PubMed
               37.       Pérez-Ramírez, J.; López, N. Strategies to break linear scaling relationships. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 971-6.  DOI
               38.       Batchelor, T. A.; Pedersen, J. K.; Winther, S. H.; Castelli, I. E.; Jacobsen, K. W.; Rossmeisl, J. High-entropy alloys as a discovery
                    platform for electrocatalysis. Joule 2019, 3, 834-45.  DOI
               39.       Artyushkova, K.; Pylypenko, S.; Olson, T. S.; Fulghum, J. E.; Atanassov, P. Predictive modeling of electrocatalyst structure based on
                    structure-to-property correlations of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic and electrochemical measurements. Langmuir 2008, 24, 9082-
                    8.  DOI  PubMed
               40.       Hearst, M.; Dumais, S.; Osuna, E.; Platt, J.; Scholkopf, B. Support vector machines. IEEE. Intell. Syst. Their. Appl. 1998, 13, 18-28.
                    DOI
               41.       Sun, H.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.; et al. High throughput screening of single atomic catalysts with optimized local structures for the
                    electrochemical oxygen reduction by machine learning. J. Energy. Chem. 2023, 81, 349-57.  DOI
               42.       Arjmandi, M.; Fattahi, M.; Motevassel, M.; Rezaveisi, H. Evaluating algorithms of decision tree, support vector machine and
                    regression for anode side catalyst data in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20309.  DOI  PubMed
                    PMC
               43.       Hossain, S. S.; Ali, S. S.; Rushd, S.; Ayodele, B. V.; Cheng, C. K. Interaction effect of process parameters and Pd-electrocatalyst in
                    formic acid electro-oxidation for fuel cell applications: implementing supervised machine learning algorithms. Int. J. Energy. Res.
                    2022, 46, 21583-97.  DOI
               44.       Tamtaji, M.; Chen, S.; Hu, Z.; Goddard, I. W. A.; Chen, G. A surrogate machine learning model for the design of single-atom catalyst
                    on carbon and porphyrin supports towards electrochemistry. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023, 127, 9992-10000.  DOI
               45.       Anbari, E.; Adib, H.; Iranshahi, D. Experimental investigation and development of a SVM model for hydrogenation reaction of
                    carbon monoxide in presence of Co–Mo/Al O  catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 276, 213-21.  DOI
                                                2  3
               46.       Sun, J.; Chen, A.; Guan, J.; et al. Interpretable machine learning-assisted high-throughput screening for understanding NRR
                    electrocatalyst performance modulation between active center and C-N coordination. Energy. Environ. Mater. 2024, 7, e12693.  DOI
               47.       Tan, S.; Wang, R.; Song, G.; et al. Machine learning and Shapley Additive Explanation-based interpretable prediction of the
                    electrocatalytic performance of N-doped carbon materials. Fuel 2024, 355, 129469.  DOI
               48.       Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ma, N.; Fan, J. Directly predicting N  electroreduction reaction free energy using interpretable machine
                                                             2
                    learning with non-DFT calculated features. J. Energy. Chem. 2024, 97, 139-48.  DOI
               49.       Wei, C.; Shi, D.; Yang, Z.; et al. Data-driven design of double-atom catalysts with high H  evolution activity/CO  reduction
                                                                                   2
                                                                                                  2
                    selectivity based on simple features. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 18168-78.  DOI
               50.       Ying, Y.; Fan, K.; Luo, X.; Qiao, J.; Huang, H. Unravelling the origin of bifunctional OER/ORR activity for single-atom catalysts
                    supported on C N by DFT and machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 16860-7.  DOI
                              2
               51.       Lin, S.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, X. C.; Chen, Z. Directly predicting limiting potentials from easily obtainable physical properties of
                    graphene-supported single-atom electrocatalysts by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 5663-70.  DOI
               52.       Lu, S.; Song, P.; Jia, Z.; et al. Symbolic transform optimized convolutional neural network model for high-performance prediction
                    and analysis of MXenes hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 85, 200-9.  DOI
               53.       Roy, D.; Charan, M. S.; Das, A.; Pathak, B. Unravelling CO  reduction reaction intermediates on high entropy alloy catalysts: an
                                                            2
                    interpretable machine learning approach to establish scaling relations. Chemistry 2024, 30, e202302679.  DOI  PubMed
               54.       Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, N.; et al. Machine learning accelerated catalysts design for CO reduction: an interpretability and
                    transferability analysis. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 213, 14-23.  DOI
               55.       Jia, X.; Li, H. Machine learning enabled exploration of multicomponent metal oxides for catalyzing oxygen reduction in alkaline
                    media. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 12487-500.  DOI
               56.       Yang, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Convolutional neural networks and volcano plots: screening and prediction of two-dimensional
                    single-atom catalystsar. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.03876. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03876. (accessed 15
                    Jan 2025)
               57.       Gilmer, J.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Riley, P. F.; Vinyals, O.; Dahl, G. E. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. arXiv 2017,
                    arXiv:1704.01212. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.01212. (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
               58.       Xie, T.; Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material
                    properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 145301.  DOI  PubMed
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114