Page 111 - Read Online

Wu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 15 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.67 Page 15 of 15

2023, 7, 125403. DOI
88. Satorras, V. G.; Hoogeboom, E.; Welling, M. E(n) equivariant graph neural networks. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.09844. Available
online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.09844 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
89. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Helwig, J.; et al. Artificial intelligence for science in quantum, atomistic, and continuum systems. arXiv 2023,
arXiv:2307.08423. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.08423 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
90. Zitnick, C. L.; Das, A.; Kolluru, A.; et al. Spherical channels for modeling atomic interactions. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.14331.
Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.14331 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
91. Passaro, S.; Zitnick, C. L. Reducing SO convolutions to SO for efficient equivariant GNNs. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.03655.
3 2
Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03655 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
92. Liao, Y. L.; Wood, B.; Das, A.; Smidt, T. EquiformerV2: improved equivariant transformer for scaling to higher-degree
representations. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.12059. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.12059 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
93. Hastie, T. J. Generalized additive models. In Statistical models in S, 1st ed.; Routledge, 2017; pp 249-307. DOI
94. Ouyang, R.; Curtarolo, S.; Ahmetcik, E.; Scheffler, M.; Ghiringhelli, L. M. SISSO: a compressed-sensing method for identifying the
best low-dimensional descriptor in an immensity of offered candidates. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 083802. DOI
95. Lin, X.; Wang, Y.; Chang, X.; Zhen, S.; Zhao, Z.; Gong, J. High-throughput screening of electrocatalysts for nitrogen reduction
reactions accelerated by interpretable intrinsic descriptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 135, e202300122. DOI
96. Ding, Z.; Pang, Y.; Ma, A.; et al. Single-atom catalysts based on two-dimensional metalloporphyrin monolayers for electrochemical
nitrate reduction to ammonia by first-principles calculations and interpretable machine learning. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 80,
586-98. DOI
97. Shu, W.; Li, J.; Liu, J. X.; et al. Structure sensitivity of metal catalysts revealed by interpretable machine learning and first-principles
calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 8737-45. DOI
98. Su, Y.; Wang, X.; Ye, Y.; et al. Automation and machine learning augmented by large language models in a catalysis study. Chem.
Sci. 2024, 15, 12200-33. DOI PubMed PMC
99. Liu, X.; Peng, H. Toward next-generation heterogeneous catalysts: empowering surface reactivity prediction with machine learning.
Engineering 2024, 39, 25-44. DOI
100. Yang, Z.; Gao, W. Applications of machine learning in alloy catalysts: rational selection and future development of descriptors. Adv.
Sci. 2022, 9, e2106043. DOI PubMed PMC
101. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. arXiv 2016,
arXiv:1602.04938. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.04938 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
102. Van der Maaten L, Hinton G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008, 9, 2579-605. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/
volume9/vandermaaten08a/vandermaaten08a.pdf. (accessed 2025-01-15).
103. Lundberg, S.; Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1705.07874. Available online: https:/
/doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
104. Omidvar, N.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; et al. Explainable AI for optimizing oxygen reduction on Pt monolayer core–shell catalysts.
Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2024, 4, e202300028. DOI
105. Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, T.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Feng, L. Accelerating materials discovery for electrocatalytic water oxidation via center-
environment deep learning in spinel oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 19362-77. DOI
106. Roh, J.; Park, H.; Kwon, H.; et al. Interpretable machine learning framework for catalyst performance prediction and validation with
dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2024, 343, 123454. DOI
107. Ding, R.; Chen, Y.; Chen, P.; et al. Machine learning-guided discovery of underlying decisive factors and new mechanisms for the
design of nonprecious metal electrocatalysts. ACS. Catal. 2021, 11, 9798-808. DOI
108. Pillai, H. S.; Li, Y.; Wang, S. H.; et al. Interpretable design of Ir-free trimetallic electrocatalysts for ammonia oxidation with graph
neural networks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 792. DOI PubMed PMC
109. Zhong, M.; Tran, K.; Min, Y.; et al. Accelerated discovery of CO electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 2020, 581,
2
178-83. DOI
110. Pablo-García, S.; Morandi, S.; Vargas-Hernández, R. A.; et al. Fast evaluation of the adsorption energy of organic molecules on
metals via graph neural networks. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2023, 3, 433-42. DOI PubMed PMC
111. Schütt, K. T.; Unke, O. T.; Gastegger, M. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular
spectra. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2102.03150. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.03150 (accessed 15 Jan 2025)
112. Szymanski, N. J.; Rendy, B.; Fei, Y.; et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 2023,
624, 86-91. DOI PubMed PMC