Page 98 - Read Online
P. 98

surgery), radiotherapy (radiotherapy vs. not radiotherapy),   Table 1: Patients and tumor characteristics
            type of chemotherapy (two-drug chemotherapy regimens   Characteristics                      n (%)
            including platinum and gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine alone   Patients (median age 68 years old, range: 45-83)  72
            vs. docetaxel vs. others), response to fi rst and second-line   Stage
            chemotherapy (responders  vs. nonresponders). Cox   III A                                   21 (29)
            multiple regression analysis was used to assess the role   III B                            11 (15)
            of those variables resulting in signifi cance by univariate   IV                             40 (56)
            analysis. Overall survival (OS) was defi ned as interval   Sex
            between start of chemotherapy to death or last follow-up   Male                             60 (83)
            visit. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defi ned  as   Female                             12 (17)
            interval between start of treatment to clinical progression   Smoking status
            or death or last follow-up visit if not having disease   Ever smoker                        66 (92)
            progression. Signifi cant differences in probability of   Never smoker                        6 (8)
            surviving between strata were evaluated by log-rank test.   Performance status
            A signifi cance level of 0.05 was chosen to assess statistical   0                           44 (61)
            signifi cance. Statistical analyses were performed using   1                                 26 (36)
            MedCalc version v9.4.2.0 (MedCalc Software, Broekstraat   ≥ 2                                2 (3)
            52, 9030 Mariakerke, Belgium).                    Surgery
                                                                Yes                                     23 (32)
            Results                                             No                                      49 (68)
            Between January 2007 and July 2013, 72 patients   Radiotherapy
            undergoing chemotherapy for advanced SCC of the lung   Yes                                  24 (33)
            at our institution were included in the analysis. Median   No                               48 (67)
            age at diagnosis was 68 years (range: 45-83); male/female   Chemotherapy
            ratio was 60/12. The majority of patients (56%) presented   Platinum + gemcitabine          48 (67)
            with stage IV, while 32 patients had stage IIIA (29%)   Gemcitabine                         15 (21)
            and IIIB (15%) stage.  Twenty-three patients (32%)   Docetaxel                               2 (3)
            underwent surgery, and 12 of these had adjuvant therapy.   Other                             7 (9)
            Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics. Median OS
            in all patients was 12.3 months (range: 1.1-72.5). By   with response to previous chemotherapy (P = 0.015):
            univariate analysis, gender (P = 0.026), PS (P = 0.0009)   median OS 18.77 and 5.83 months for responders and
            and surgery (P = 0.02) were related to OS. No signifi cant   nonresponders, respectively [Figure 3].  A signifi cant
            relationship was found between OS and age, type of   impact in terms of different PFS was seen as a function
            treatment, smoking status, or BMI.                of response to second-line therapy (5.9  vs. 2.7 months,

            In the fi rst-line setting, we observed partial responses (PR)   P  = 0.007). Finally, only 11 patients received third-line
            in 21 patients (29%), progressive disease (PD) in   chemotherapy.
            30 cases (42%), with 10 patients (14%) showing stable   Discussion
            disease (SD). No complete remissions (CR) were
            obtained. In 11 cases (15%) response was not reported.  Genomic alterations in SCC of the lung have not been
                                                              comprehensively characterized, and molecular targeted
            By univariate analysis, a better OS (P < 0.0001)   therapies have mainly shown no effi cacy.  To date, the
            and a better PFS (P < 0.0001) were associated with   most important molecular and therapeutic achievements in
            response to  fi rst-line chemotherapy: median OS   advanced NSCLC have been mostly confi ned to patients
            was 19.7 vs. 7.17 months for responders and nonresponders   with nonsquamous histology. However, recent research
            patients, respectively [Figure 1]. Median PFS was   is focusing on identifying potential driver mutations
            8.5 months in responders as compared to 2.9 months in   affecting SCC patients. [6,7]  In a recent large phase III
            nonresponders [Figure 2].
                                                              trial, necitumumab added to cisplatin and gemcitabine
            These variables, with the exception of PS, maintained   as  fi rst-line treatment increased survival in patients with
            statistical signifi cance even by multivariate analysis   advanced SCC. [8,9]  Nevertheless, at present, the standard
            and proved to independently affect the outcome:   frontline treatment remains exclusively chemotherapy. For
            sex (P = 0.019), surgery (P = 0.036), response to   patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCC, two-drug
            fi rst-line therapy (P < 0.0001).  Thirty patients (42%)   chemotherapy regimens (including cisplatin or carboplatin
            received chemotherapy as second-line therapy. Median   and a third-generation agent, such as gemcitabine, taxanes,
            OS in this group was 6.43 months (range: 0.6-54.4),   or vinorelbine) currently remain the standard of treatment
            with PFS of 3.1 months (range: 0.4-51.4). Moreover,   options.   A single agent (mainly docetaxel) is the
                                                                     [10]
            in the second-line setting, better OS was associated   preferred treatment in second-line setting. [11]

                Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment  ¦  Volume 1 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July 15, 2015 ¦        91
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103