Page 84 - Read Online
P. 84

anthracycline-containing regimens, the 3-year OS is   Results
            almost halved when a non-anthracycline-containing
            regimen is used with an absolute survival reduction of   Patients’ characteristics
            23%. [12]                                         CHOP and CVP were administered to 351 (84%) and
                                                              67 (16%) patients, respectively. Compared with those
            Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to
            investigate the effectiveness of non-anthracycline   receiving CVP, patients receiving CHOP were signifi cantly
            chemotherapy regimen on elderly DLBCNHL patients   younger, having less comorbidity, better performance
            by mainly focusing on geriatric organ dysfunction, frailty   status (PS), fewer B-symptoms, and lower International
            and comorbidities  vs. suboptimal treatment with the   Prognostic Index-risk (IPI-risk) categories [Table 1].
            cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) vs.   Logistic regression analysis assessed the impact of different
            the standard CHOP to assess the factors that impact the   baseline characteristics on the likelihood to receive CHOP
            regimen choice.                                   or CVP. Only age and comorbidities were independent
                                                              determinants of the regimen received [Table 2]. Older
            Methods                                           patients had 10.5 odds of not receiving CHOP compared
                                                              to the younger patients (95% confi dence interval (CI):
            Study population                                  4.6-23.6; P < 0.001). Patients with comorbidities had 37.2
            This retrospective clinical study included 418 patients   odds of not receiving CHOP compared to those with no
            with a confi rmed DLBCNHL diagnosis at Tanta Cancer   comorbidities (95% CI: 12.6-109.6; P < 0.001).
            Center, Gharbiah, Egypt between 2003 and 2006.
            Diagnosis of DLBCNHL was based on histology and   Table 1: Characteristics of 418 DLBCNHL patients
            immunohistochemical data on CD19, CD20, and CD    Characteristic  Subgroup      n (%)         P
            22 expression. Patients were treated with either CHOP                       CHOP     CVP
            chemotherapy regimen (c  yclophosphamide 750 mg/m    n                       351      67
                                                          2
                                                       2
            intravenous (IV) on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m  IV   Age        Mean ± SD  48.6 ± 13.3  69.7 ± 8.8  < 0.001
            on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m  (maximum 2 mg) IV               < 70       334 (95.2) 29 (43.3)
                                       2
            on day 1 and   prednisone 100 mg p.o. for 5 days) or            ≥ 70        17 (4.8)  38 (56.7) < 0.001
            CVP regimen (same as CHOP without doxorubicin) and   LDH        ≤ Normal   78 (22.2)  12 (17.9)
            followed-up until March 2014 via phone conversation.            > Normal   273 (77.8) 55 (82.1)  0.431
            Response to therapy was assessed using the response   Gender    Female     176 (50.1) 30 (44.8)
            criteria developed by the lymphoma International                Male       175 (49.9) 37 (55.2)  0.421
            Working Group.  OS is calculated from the date of   Comorbidity  No        289 (82.3)  4 (6.0)
                          [14]
            diagnosis to the date of death from any cause or last           Yes        62 (17.7)  63 (94)  < 0.001
            follow-up. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated   Bulky disease  Yes   40 (11.4)  6 (9.0)
            from the date of starting treatment to the date of              No         311 (88.6) 61 (91.0)  0.673
                                                         [14]
            relapse, progression, death or last follows up.    PS grouping  0-1        221 (63.0) 21 (31.3)
            Clinicopathological data were extracted from patients’          2-4        130 (37.0) 46 (69.7) < 0.001
            medical records.  This study was approved by the   Extra-nodal   No        232 (66.1) 44 (65.7)
            Institutional Review Board of the Egyptian National   disease   Yes        119 (33.9) 23 (34.3)  0.946
            Cancer Institute.                                 Stage         1          68 (19.4)  16 (23.9)
                                                                            2          128 (36.5) 20 (29.9)
            Statistical analyses                                            3          119 (33.9) 23 (34.3)
            Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS              4          36 (10.3)  8 (11.9)  0.701
            software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).   B symptoms  A       191 (54.4) 27 (40.3)
            Nominal and categorical variables were compared                 B          160 (45.6) 40 (59.7)  0.034
            using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Numerical   IPI risk category Low  85 (24.2)  3 (4.5)
            variables were compared using  t-test or Man-Whitney’s          Low        150 (42.7) 15 (22.4)
            test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to describe     intermediate
            the use of CHOP or CVP, controlling for patient                 High       86 (24.5)  18 (26.9)
            covariates. Unadjusted survival was estimated using             intermediate
            the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared                High        30 (8.5)  31 (46.3) < 0.001
            using the log-rank test. Stepwise Cox regression hazards   aaIPI groups  0-1  90 (25.6)  17 (25.4)
            model was used for calculating adjusted survival for            2-3        261 (74.4) 50 (74.6)  0.963
            each treatment, controlling for patients covariates.   DLBCNHL: Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma;
                                                              CHOP: Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and
            A probability P  ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically   prednisone; CVP: Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone;
            signifi cant. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary   SD: Standard deviation; LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase;
            endpoint included EFS, complete response (CR) rate, and   IPI: International prognostic index; aaIPI: Age-adjusted
            treatment-related toxicities.                     international prognostic index; PS: Performance status

                Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment  ¦  Volume 1 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ July 15, 2015 ¦        77
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89