Page 102 - Read Online
P. 102

Jalal et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2023;9:11  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.122  Page 5 of 11

               Although it provides better imaging capability than CT and MRI scans, EUS alone is insufficient for
                                                             [32]
               differentiating between benign and malignant IPMNs . The advantage of EUS is that it can be combined
               with other techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy, for example, EUS fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)
               or other newly developed tools like through-the-needle micro-forceps biopsy (TTNB), or confocal laser
               endomicroscopy (CLE).

               EUS-FNA and cystic fluid analysis
               EUS-FNA improves diagnostic accuracy by obtaining fluid samples for cytological, chemical, and molecular
                         [33]
               assessments . EUS-FNA can differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous lesions and help to identify high-
               risk features .
                         [34]

               Cytology
               The identification of malignancy during cytological assessment using EUS-FNA was reported to have a
                                                            [32]
               sensitivity of 25%-88% and a specificity of 83%-99% . The occurrence of macrophages, histiocytes, and
               neutrophils in a cytological assessment suggests a pseudocyst, while the presence of mucin indicates an
                                                                                            [32]
               MCN. Although not commonly seen, glycogen-rich cuboidal cells are diagnostic of SCA . The reported
               sensitivity in the literature in identifying MCNs was 54%-63% and the specificity was 88%-93% [35,36] .

               Tumour markers
               Various tumour markers have been used to differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous PCLs and
               between malignant and benign PCLs. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9,
               CA 72-4, and CA72-4 have been reported to present in higher levels in mucinous cysts and can aid in
               discriminating between mucinous and non-mucinous PCLs. With a CA 72-4 cut-off level of 3.32 ng/mL, the
               sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in differentiating mucinous cysts were 80%, 69.5%, and 73.6%,
               respectively . Another study used a cut-off of 7  U/mL with a sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 61%, and an
                         [37]
                             [38]
               accuracy of 72% . A meta-analysis using a CA 19-9 cut-off of 35-45 U/mL in detecting mucinous PCLs
               produced a sensitivity of 47% and specificity of 88% . Due to CA 19-9 being a constituent of normal
                                                             [39]
               pancreatic digestive juices, its concentration might be similar in pseudocysts and mucinous lesions. This
               limits the diagnostic potential of CA 19-9, particularly when the study population includes patients with
               pseudocysts. However, a high level of CA 19-9 should always warrant the suspicion of malignant or
               potentially malignant pancreatic cystic lesions.


               A CEA cut-off of 192 ng/mL is used in clinical practice to diagnose mucinous pancreatic cysts . A recent
                                                                                                [40]
               meta-analysis found that a cut-off of 192 ng/mL was highly specific (88.6%) for differentiating mucinous
               from non-mucinous cysts and had a sensitivity of 60.4% .
                                                              [41]

               Biochemical markers
               Intra-cystic glucose measurement has yielded promising results in differentiating mucinous from non-
               mucinous cysts. In a multicentre study, a glucose concentration of ≤ 25 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 88.1% and
               a specificity of 91.2% in detecting mucinous pancreatic cysts .
                                                                 [42]

               Although amylase has been studied more widely than lipase, it has been noted that both have no useful
                                                                        [33]
               diagnostic potential for identifying cysts with a malignant tendency . If a pseudocyst has been excluded, a
               high level of amylase may indicate an IPMN because it suggests a communication between the cyst and the
               pancreatic duct.
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107