Page 105 - Read Online
P. 105

Page 8 of 11         Jalal et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2023;9:11  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.122

               Attempts have been made to incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) technology into clinical practice to aid
               the management of PCLs and reduce human bias. Kurita et al. obtained a high diagnostic accuracy (92.9%)
               by constructing a diagnostic algorithm using relevant variables: CEA, CA 125, a cystic fluid amylase, the
                                                                                                   [67]
               type of cyst, sex, cyst location, the connection of the pancreatic duct to the cyst, and the type of cyst . This
               type of AI algorithm relies on the quality and availability of the relevant information that is fed into it. Its
               functionality may be impaired if information is missing. Kuwahara et al. obtained a diagnostic accuracy of
               86.2% in detecting malignancy in IPMNs via deep learning using EUS images . In addition, their study
                                                                                   [68]
               yielded higher accuracy than human diagnosis or the presence of mural nodules; however, there was more
               cancer compared to routine clinical practice. The study was limited by its sample size and retrospective
               nature. By using clinical, imaging, and molecular markers from 436 patients, another retrospective study
               developed a supervised learning software programme to categorise PCLs into those that require surgery or
               surveillance and those that can be safely discharged . Using histopathology as a gold standard, the clinical
                                                           [69]
               management outcome from using the software was more accurate than from standard care.

               EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation using ethanol and/or paclitaxel has been investigated for the non-
               surgical treatment of PCLs. It can provide a minimally invasive treatment, especially for those deemed at
               high risk for surgical resection. A small study (n = 13) reported complete or partial resolution in 12
                      [70]
               patients . A larger study (n = 162) confirmed its high efficacy in unilocular and small cysts with complete
               or partial resolution in 91.8%. During the follow-up period, out of 114 patients (post-ablation), only two had
               cyst recurrences in six years .
                                      [71]

               PCLs have stimulated considerable research on developing new imaging, endoscopic, and sampling
               techniques. The approach to each patient should be individualised based on their clinical status, the
               presence of co-morbidities, and the risk of malignancy. MRI may help to identify mucinous cysts or
               malignant changes. However, a combination of imaging morphology with EUS-FNA may be required.
               Cystic fluid biomarkers can be used as an adjunct in predicting high-risk PCLs and those requiring early
               surgical resections. TTNB, nCLE, and pancreatoscopy are promising new tests that can be used in the
               assessment and management of PCLs. Pancreatoscopy should be reserved for equivocal cases due to the
               high risk of pancreatitis. Some of the advances reported in this review may not be applicable in clinical
               practice due to their limited availability. Therefore, the classic high-risk physical symptoms remain the most
               important and valuable predictors of surgical therapy.

               Future research is required to develop non-invasive tests and markers that can differentiate benign from
               premalignant or malignant PCLs.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the article and interpreting the relevant
               literature: Jalal M, Gbadegesin S, Ibrahim S, Tehami N
               Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content: Jalal M, Gbadegesin S, Ibrahim
               S, Tehami N

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110