Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70

Barrett’s Esophagus                               which  are  related  to  an  intestinal  phenotype. [27]
                                                              Furthermore,  BMP4  shifts  the  gene  expression  profi le
            BE  is  defi ned  by  American  Gastroenterological   of normal squamous cells into columnar cells. Because
            Association as “BE is the condition in which any extent   cytokeratin  (CK)  is  a  major  cytoskeleton  molecule,
            of  metaplastic  columnar  epithelium  that  predisposes  to   it  can  be  regarded  as  a  representative  phenotype  of
            cancer  development  replaces  the  stratifi ed  squamous   certain cells. CK 13/14 expressions are highly expressed
                                                         [10]
            epithelium  that  normally  lines  the  distal  esophagus.”    in  squamous  cells,  whereas  CK  7,  8,  18,  and  20
            This  means  a  specialized  columnar  epithelium   expressions  elevated  in  BE  epithelium. [28]   It  has  been
            characterized  by  columnar  cells,  goblet  cells,  and  a   shown  that  expression  of  SOX9,  but  not  CDX2  or
            villous-like structure. [11,12]  However, another classifi cation   BMP4,  induces  squamous  epithelial  cells  formation
            includes  two  types  of  BE.  One  is  “junctional  or  cardiac   toward  columnar-like  epithelium  with  expression  of
            type,”  consisting  of  the  predominantly  foveolar  surface   CK  8. [29]   SHH/BMP  signaling  were  also  activated  in
            containing  mucous  glands  and  resembling  cardiac   a  mouse  model  with  interleukin-1β  overexpression.
            mucous  glands.  Another  one  is  “gastric-fundic  type,”   After  one  year  of  continuous  infl ammation,  intestinal
            containing  both  parietal  and  chief  cells  with  atrophic   metaplasia occurred at the SCJ, and the gene expression
            fundic glands. [11-13]  Thus, the histological defi nition of BE   pattern of those metaplastic cells was similar to those in
            remains controversial.
                                                              human BE. [30]
            The cell of origin of BE has not yet been elucidated. Six   Recent  advances  of  next-generation  sequencing  have
            cell  types  are  currently  considered  as  potential  origins,   provided  the  opportunity  to  elucidate  genetic  alterations
            including  transdifferentiation  of  esophageal  squamous   such  as  single  nucleotide  polymorphisms  (SNPs).
            cells,   gastric  cardia  cells,   esophageal  submucosal   The  association  between  SNPs  and  BE  has  been
                                    [15]
                [14]
            gland  cells,   esophageal  progenitor  cells,   circulating   clarifi ed.  It  has  been  reported  that  chromosomes
                                               [17]
                     [16]
            bone  marrow  cells,   and  residual  embryonic  cells  at   2p24  (rs3072),  12q24  (rs2701108),  6p21  (rs9257809),
                            [18]
            squamo-columunar junction (SCJ). [19]
                                                              and  16q24  (rs9936833)  are  related  to  risk  of  BE
            There are some reports suggesting an association between   development. [31,32]   Among  these  SNPs,  rs9936833  at
            p63  and  intestinal  metaplasia.  p63  null  embryos  have   16q24 is located close to FOXF1, which is a transcription
                                    [20]
            idiopathic  metaplasia  in  SCJ.   It  has  been  shown  that   factor  in  the  SHH  signaling  pathway.  Interestingly,
            genetic  alterations  in  metaplastic  cells  in  mice  lacking   FOXF1  is  associated  with  embryonic  development
                                               [21]
            p63  were  similar  to  those  in  human  BE.   It  has  also   of  gastrointestinal  tract  formation,  especially  the
            been suggested that epithelium with such genetic changes   esophagus.   Also,  the  importance  of  FOXP3,  at
                                                                       [33]
            may  originally  exist  at  SCJ.  Also,  lack  of  SRY  (sex   3p14  (rs2687201),  which  is  also  known  to  possess  a
            determining  region  Y)  box  2  (SOX2)  induces  columnar   role  in  esophageal  organogenesis,  is  based  on  analyzing
                                                                                       [34]
            changes  in  esophageal  epithelium  in  mice  models.    datasets of BE or EAC cases.  19p13 (rs10419226) and
                                                         [22]
            Both p63 and SOX2 are essential for squamous epithelial   9p22  (rs11789015),  with  signifi cant  relation  to  BE  and
            formation during organogenesis. Although these fi ndings   EAC, has also been identifi ed. rs10419226 SNPs at 19p13
            were based on studies using rodent esophagus, there are   are  known  as  an  intronic  variant  of  cAMP-regulated
            structural  differences  in  the  esophageal  between  rodents   transcriptional  co-activators  (CRTC1  ).  CRTC  signaling
            and human. For example, in rodents, the esophagus lacks   exerts  oncogenic  activities  when  activated  by  loss  of
            submucosal  glands  and  SCJ  is  located  in  mid-stomach.   LKB1  through  transcriptional  activation  of  LYPD3,
                                                                                                           [35]
            Therefore,  fi ndings  in  rodent  models  may  not  be   which  contributes  to  esophageal  tumor  progression.
            applicable to human BE.                           rs11789015  SNP  at  9p22  is  located  at  the  intron  region
                                                              of  BARX1.  BARX1  is  a  transcription  factor  involved  in
            Molecular  and  Genetic  Alterations  Related     tracheal  and  foregut  organogenesis  in  developing  mouse
            to   Intestinal   Metaplasia   and   Intestinal   embryos. [36,37]  These  fi ndings  suggest  that  key  molecules
            Differentiation                                   in BE development may overlap with those in esophageal
                                                              development.
            Sonic  hedgehog  (SHH)/bone  morphogenetic  protein
            (BMP)  signaling  plays  an  important  role  in  the   Wnt/β-catenin,  and  Notch  are  critical  signaling  for
            development  of  columnar  metaplasia,  being  associated   intestinal  differentiation.  Wnt  family  is  one  of  the
            with organogenesis, especially of the esophageal. These   fundamental  mechanisms  of  cell  proliferation,  polarity,
                                                                              [38]
            are  critical  molecules  for  separating  trachea  from  the   and  differentiation.   Wnt  signaling  pathways  include
            esophagus [23]   and  are  involved  in  the  development  of   Wnt/β-catenin  canonical  pathway  and  Wnt/calcium
            cell-renewable  epithelium. [24]   Expressions  of  SHH  and   or  Wnt/planar  cell  polarity  non-canonical  pathway.
                BMP4 are usually low in human squamous epithelia. In   Among  these, Wnt/β-catenin  pathway  is  associated  with
            BE tissue, however, SHH/BMP4 signaling induces SRY   intestinal  type  gene  expressions. [39,40]   Wnt  signaling  also
            (sex  determining  region  Y)  box  9  (SOX9). [25,26]   SOX9   regulates CDX gene expression, which controls intestinal
                                                                                           [41]
            subsequently  induces  CDX2  and  MUC2  expression,   differentiation,  and  homeostasis.   Notch  signaling
            124                                   Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment  ¦  Volume 1 ¦ Issue 3 ¦ October 15, 2015 ¦
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75