Page 49 - Read Online
P. 49

Galli et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:48  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.19  Page 11 of 14

                                                                           [18]
               cohort of patients with recurrent LSCC undergoing STL after (C)RT . To our knowledge, a consensus
               regarding radiological scoring criteria for suspicious LN has not been published. Our results for PET/CT
               show an excellent NPV of 96.9%. The role of MRI in the re-staging of the neck in patients with recurrent
               LSCC seems largely underexplored in previous studies. Similar to PET/CT, our results showed MRI to have
               a very good NPV (94.1%). The rationale for both modalities is that PET/CT is a staging method for the neck
               as well as for distant metastases. Nevertheless, it provides limited additional information over other imaging
               techniques  with  regard  to  the  primary  tumor.  MRI  complements  PET/CT  for  morphological
               characterization, and thus staging of the primary, and can equally help with neck staging given that the
               main downside of PET/CT in the irradiated neck is the high rate of false positives. We therefore
               recommend performing both imaging modalities before committing to a salvage procedure. In the future,
               the diagnostic yield of novel combined imaging modalities such as PET/MRI should be investigated in this
               field.

               While ultrasound and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology have been routinely and consistently used for
               assessing lymph node status at our institution over the last decade, they are mostly used in the context of
               follow-up, not to confirm radiographically suspicious LNs in the neck. In the literature, assessment of nodal
               status with ultrasound of recurrent laryngeal cancer previously treated with (C)RT has not been evaluated
               by any study in the past 10 years. However, it is possible to confirm radiographically suspicious LN
               metastases with FNA. In the study of Fleischman et al., specificity of up to 100% was found for FNA
                                                                                 [37]
               performed to confirm persistent head and neck SCC after CRT in neck LNs . However, FNA harbors a
               non-negligible false negative rate of up to 33% , and LN metastases will be missed if ND is omitted.
                                                      [38]
               Salvage total laryngectomy has a high adverse event rate compared with primary total laryngectomy, with
                                                                       [39]
               this being reported to be up to 67.5% in a review by Hasan et al. . Likewise, our cohort had a high early
               adverse event rate (grades I-V, Clavien-Dindo score) of 51.4%. Hasan et al. showed that concomitant ND is
                                                 [39]
               a risk factor for complications in STL . Therefore, in radiologically staged cN0 necks, ND should be
               discussed in multidisciplinary team meetings and may be omitted to avoid postoperative complications.

               There are several limitations to our present study, including the modest cohort size and the retrospective
               study design. Moreover, the low disease prevalence influences the application of Bayes’ theorem and limits
               the results of our study. Furthermore, routine histopathological assessment of neck specimens, as performed
               in our patients, may overlook up to 15% of micrometastases, and the real number of occult metastases may
               be higher .
                       [40]

               It should be noted that existing cohorts tend to be small, given the need to select a homogeneous
               population. Furthermore, although our findings suggest that occult neck nodal metastatic disease is
               uncommon in patients undergoing STL with negative nodal stage on MRI and/or PET/CT, they do not
               exclude the possibility that there may be a subset of patients at increased risk of harboring metastases. The
               small number of pN+ cases in our series precluded meaningful evaluation of such risk factors. By contrast,
               the widespread use of MRI and/or PET/CT likely facilitated a high degree of accuracy and consistency in
               preoperative staging of recurrence in the neck.


               CONCLUSION
               We found rates of occult neck node metastasis of 3.2%, 6.1%, and 3.8% in recurrent LSCC re-staged with
               PET/CT, MRI, and MRI + PET/CT together. High negative predictive values were found for both
               modalities. In cases in which preoperative MRI or PET/CT suggests nodal metastases, ND is clearly
               indicated. In contrast, in patients with a negative nodal stage on MRI and/or PET/CT, omitting the ND
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54