Page 47 - Read Online
P. 47

Galli et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:48  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.19  Page 9 of 14



































                     Figure 5. Flowchart with status of all 41 patients at last follow-up after salvage total laryngectomy and neck dissection.


               DISCUSSION
               In this study, we assessed the diagnostic value of MRI and PET/CT in the re-staging of the neck of patients
               with recurrent LSCC undergoing STL after failed (C)RT. The main findings were: (1) the prevalence of
               occult metastases in this disease setting is low (6.1% in patients staged with MRI, 3.2% in patients staged
               with PET/CT, and 3.8% in patients staged with MRI + PET/CT); (2) both MRI and PET/CT have a good
               NPV (93.9% and 96.8%, respectively) but their combination is not superior (96.2%), with both modalities
               having poor sensitivity and PPV [Table 3]; (3) loco-regional disease control after STL and ND at last
               follow-up was 60.9%.

               The indications for ND and its prognostic impact in patients with recurrent LSCC are not fully clear. In the
               context of recurrences after (C)RT, patients with obvious nodal disease require elective ND at the time of
               STL. However, those with rcN0 necks pose more of a challenge, as both under-treatment and unnecessary
               surgery may have potentially negative effects in terms of prognosis and adverse events. It has to be kept in
               mind that tissue changes to the neck following (C)RT, particularly fibrosis, often lead to increased
                                          [23]
               morbidity during and after ND . For primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a risk
               threshold of 20% for occult metastasis is generally accepted as an indication for ND or RT on the neck .
                                                                                                       [24]
               Whether this 20% threshold can be applied to recurrent cancer is disputed, with some authors claiming that
               a more stringent threshold of 15% is more appropriate in this setting [25,26] . Given that curative options in the
               case of treatment failure after STL are scarce, it could be argued that a more aggressive attitude is indeed
               meaningful, especially in the case of supraglottic recurrences and initially advanced neck nodal disease .
                                                                                                     [25]
               It should be noted that systematic reviews and meta-analyses by Gross et al., Lin C et al., and Lin D et al. did
               not demonstrate a significant pooled 5-year disease-free and overall survival advantage for ND vs.
               observation of the neck after STL in rcN0 individuals [27-29] , although there was a trend for improved survival
               with ND in supraglottic and locally advanced recurrent LSCC [28,29] .
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52