Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Briggs et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:46  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.84                            Page 5 of 13

               Table 2. Gene mutation, gene expression, and histologic prognostic biomarkers
                            Mutation biomarker                     Cohort therapy or histology  PFS/DFS             OS                          n
                Gene mutation  BAP1 (vs. WT) [23]                  Anti-VEGF                                        28.7 vs. not reached, P = 0.02  105
                                        [24]
                            CDKN2A (vs. WT)                        Papillary RCC                                    Shorter, P < 0.0001         161
                                        [24]
                            CIMP/FH (vs. WT)                       Papillary RCC                                    Shorter, P < 0.0001         161
                                                [25]
                            ERV (2282, 3382) (continuous)          N                       Associated, P < 0.05     Associated, P < 0.05        181
                                          [25,31,32]
                            PBRM-1 LOF (vs. WT)                    N                       HR = 0.067, P = 0.03     HR = 0.65, P = 0.03         189
                                                                   N                       Associated, P = 0.0056   Associated, P < 0.001       261
                                                                   N                       Longer, P = 0.029        Longer, P = 0.0074          35
                            PBRM-1 LOF + pancreatic mets (vs. WT) [63]  Anti-angiogenic    HR = 0.34, P = 0.007                                 12
                                                                   N                       HR = 2.15, P = 0.034                                 9
                                                                                                                    HR = 0.25, P < 0.001        31
                                     [23]
                            TERT (vs. WT)                          Anti-VEGF                                        29.6 months vs. 52.6 months, P = 0.03  105
                            TMB (high vs. low) [45]                ccRCC                   Shorter, P < 0.05        Shorter, P < 0.05           1118
                                        [35]
                Gene expression  ERV (high vs. low)                N                       7 months vs. 2.6 months, P = 0.01                    99
                                          [36]
                            ERV3-2 (high vs. low)                  ICI                     HR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.05-0.44                          24
                                                [24]
                            NQO1 expression (high vs. low)         Papillary RCC                                    Shorter, P = 0.001          161
                                            [37]
                Histology   CAIX ≤ 85% (vs. > 85%)                                                                  (CSS HR = 3.10, P < 0.001)  321
                            CAIX score ≥ 200 (vs. ≤ 100) [21]                              HR = 0.69, P = 0.01      HR = 0.60, P = 0.01         813
                                                                                                                    (CSS HR = 0.69, P = 0.01)
                            CD8+ density in Tumor Center (higher vs. lower) [28]  S        HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.47-0.82                          804 †
                                                        [38]
                            Type 1 macrophage infiltration (high vs. low)  Anti-angiogenic TKIs                     HR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.17-2.03  409
                            Type 2 macrophage infiltration (high vs. low) [38]  Anti-angiogenic TKIs  HR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.09-1.78  HR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.06-1.81  409
               †Total sample size of patients with measured biomarker (n of direct comparison not available). Grey Cell: Positive association; White Cell: negative association; OS: overall survival; ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor;
               N: nivolumab; S: sunitinib; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; ccRCC: clear cell RCC; DFS: disease free survival; HR: hazard ratio; CSS: cancer specific survival; PFS: progression free survival; BAP: ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal
               hydrolase; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; LOF: loss of function; CAIX: carbonic anhydrase IX; CDKN: cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor; CIMP: CpG island methylator phenotype; FH: fumarate hydratase;
               TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; PBRM-1: polybromo-1; TERT: telomerase reverse transcriptase; TMB: tumor mutational burden.


               PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS
               Biomarkers predictive of ORR or TTF are limited. Low hemoglobin and high neutrophils have been associated with reduced TTF in patients on cytokine
               therapy . In the more contemporary era of targeted therapy, elevated CRP and MET mutations have been associated with improved response to anti-VEGFR
                      [14]
                                                                                                                             [23]
               therapy [18,39] . PBRM-1 mutations and lack of BAP1 mutations have been associated with improved response to anti-VEGF therapy . Mutations in the mTOR
               pathway (TSC1, TSC2, MTOR) and expression of PTEN have been associated with improved response to mTOR inhibitors [40-42] .
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41