Page 367 - Read Online
P. 367

Page 12 of 16                         Anstine et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:50  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.24

               behavior are likely mirrored in breast cancer cells. Therefore, understanding the reciprocal interactions
               between epithelial cells and their niche should also inform the mechanisms underlying tumor initiation and
               metastasis.

               In this regard, the recent studies using sc-RNA-sequencing outside the context of disruptive transplantation
               assays, have revealed that epithelial populations may be more highly influenced by the surrounding
               environmental cues than previously appreciated. As discussed earlier, previous studies using transplantation
               assays demonstrated the multipotent potential of rare mammary epithelial cells within the adult gland [22,23] .
               However, lineage tracing analyses were unable to replicate these results and recent sc-RNA-sequencing has
               further supported the lack of multipotent cells during adulthood. Thus, it has become increasingly apparent
               that introduction of isolated cells into wounded stromal environment may elicit cellular phenotypes that are
               not supported under normal physiological conditions. A similar phenomenon is likely to occur with breast
               cancer initiation and progression. While acquisition of an “oncogenic” mutation may occur in varied cells
               along the differentiation hierarchy, its impact on tumorigenesis and progression may rely upon the stromal
               microenvironment, particularly an environment that is reflective of wound repair such as that which occurs
               with high breast density , obesity , and in post-lactational remodeling . The same is also likely to be
                                    [97]
                                                                              [99]
                                             [98]
               true with metastasizing cancer cells. Instructional interactions between the epithelium and surrounding
               stroma are well established. This was most exquisitely demonstrated in extensive studies by Smith and
               colleagues revealing that the local microenvironment of the mammary gland is sufficient to reprogram
               progenitor cells from completely different tissues (including testicular and embryonic stem cells) into
               mammary progenitors that were capable of forming normal mammary gland structures [100-104] . Furthermore,
               alterations in the microenvironment may influence cellular transformation. In work by Barcellos-Hoff and
               Ravani , irradiating the cleared fat pads of recipient mice, lead to alterations in growth factor activity
                     [105]
               and extracellular matrix composition. Following irradiation, implantation of non-tumorigenic mammary
               epithelial cells resulted in tumor formation more readily in irradiated mice. Conversely, epithelial tumor
               cells injected into non-irradiated mammary fat pads reverted to form normal mammary gland ducts rather
               than tumors .
                          [106]

               The effects of contextual cues on the epigenetic and transcriptional status of major transcriptional regulators
               has also been recently highlighted. Although SOX10 is highly expressed in cells isolated from MMTV-PyMT
               tumors, this expression was lost when cells were grown in 2D culture conditions . The loss of SOX10
                                                                                       [58]
               expression was associated with a switch from open to closed chromatin at the SOX10 locus, emphasizing
               the role of environmental cues on epigenetic status. This is not a new concept, as changes in the epigenetic
               landscape are known to occur in response to hormonal exposure [62,107] .



               CONCLUSION
               The scRNA-sequencing studies reviewed here have provided a detailed transcriptional map of mammary
               epithelial differentiation. However, these data indicate that previously underappreciated complexity
               undoubtedly underlies the regulation of the heterogeneous transcriptional networks observed. The unique
               transcriptional status within each epithelial cell is likely correlated with a unique epigenetic profile and it is
               anticipated that these profiles have a considerable level of plasticity that is dictated by the microenvironment
               and, in the case of tumors, mutational status. Studies examining the chromatin accessibility within bulk
               isolations of epithelial populations (MaSCs, basal, luminal and luminal progenitors) have demonstrated that
               each population is associated with distinctive active and repressed regions, many of which are associated with
               functional consequences and specific tumor subtypes [12,58,107] . The emerging ability to simultaneously assess
               both the transcriptional and epigenetic status at a single cell level should allow for clearer understanding of
               the lineage relationships in the normal gland and in tumors as well as reveal whether tumor cells can readily
               transition through states as has been observed in the normal breast. It is important to note, however, that
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372