Page 158 - Read Online
P. 158

Page 6 of 17                         Mooney et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:19  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.93

               Table 2. Forward and reverse primer sequences for qRT-PCR
                Target              Forward sequence (5’ → 3’)               Reverse sequence (5’ → 3’)
                EGFR          CTC CCA GTG CCT GAA TAC ATA AA            CCG TGG TCA TGC TCC AAT AA
                β-catenin     GCT CCT TCT CTG AGT GGT AAA G             CAC CTG GTC CTC GTC ATT TAG CTT GTA
                Vimentin      GAT TCA CTC CCT CTG GTT GAT AC            GGA GTG TCG GTT GTT
                NKD2          AGA TAC ACA TGC CGT ACA CCA C             CGG CAG GTA GTA GCT GAA GG
                TGF-α         CCC TGC GAA GAC TTG AGA TTT A             GGA GCT TGC AGA GAT GGA TTA G
                GAPDH         GAT TCC ACC CAT GGC AAA TTC               GTC ATG AGT CCT TCC ACG ATA C
                β-actin       AAA GAC CTG TAC GCC AAC ACA GTG CTG TCT   CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT TGC TGA TCC ACA TCT G
               qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction


               Table 3. Antibodies used for western blot analysis
                Target                  Species                 Company               Dilution/concentration
                EGFR                     Goat                Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1:500
                E-cadherin               Rabbit              Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1:500
                Vimentin                 Mouse               Abcam                         1:1000
                TGF-α                    Rabbit              Abcam                         0.2 μg/mL
                β-catenin                Mouse               Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1 μg/mL
                NKD2                     Rabbit              Abcam                         1:500
                β-actin                  Mouse               Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1:1000
                GAPDH                    Mouse               Life Technologies             1 μg/mL
                pERK                     Mouse               Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1:500
                pEGFR                    Goat                Santa Cruz Biotechnology      1:500


               RIPA buffer was added to give a final volume of 20 µL per well. β-actin was utilized as a loading control
                                             TM
                                                        TM
               and 10 µL of Precision Plus Protein  WesternC  Standards (BioRad, Hercules, CA) was added to a well as
               a molecular weight reference. The proteins were wet-transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane for 1 h at
               100V. The transfer buffer consisted of 1 × Tris-glycine buffer with 20% (v/v) methanol. Prior to transfer, the
               nitrocellulose membrane was incubated for 10 min in 100% methanol for activation. Following wet transfer,
               the nitrocellulose membrane was washed three times in Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (TBST) in 15-
               min intervals and incubated for 1 h at RT in 5% (w/v) BSA diluted in TBST. The nitrocellulose membrane
               was incubated overnight at 4 ºC in a primary antibody [Table 3], which was diluted in TBST. Three 15-
               min washes in TBST were performed, followed by one-hour incubation at RT in a secondary antibody
               diluted in TBST. Three washes were performed again in TBST and the nitrocellulose membrane was placed
                            TM
               in Supersignal  West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA)
               according to manufacturer’s instructions. Signal detection was accomplished using a FluorChem E system
               (Protein Simple, San Jose, CA).


               Statistical analysis
               Data analyses were performed using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. Data were expressed as
               the mean ± standard deviation. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Experiments were
               repeated 2-3 times.


               RESULTS
               ESC-microstrands increase MDA-MB-231 BCC sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs
               Highly aggressive MDA-MB-231 BCCs were treated with the chemotherapeutic drugs Erlotinib and PNU
               74654, which inhibit the EGFR and canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways, respectively. For both
               drugs, there was a reduction in BCC viability when treated at a dose of 20 µmol/L with a 24-h recovery
               period [Figure 2A].

               PNU 74654 decreased metastatic BCC viability more than Erlotinib, with a reduction exceeding 30%.
               Combining both drugs further diminished cell viability compared to individual treatment. To examine the
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163