Page 43 - Read Online
P. 43

Terai et al.                                                                                                                                                                    The liver and metastatic uveal melanoma

            A                                               B



















           C                                                D



















           Figure 3: Liver immune microenvironment and tumor growth. A: immune attack on circulating tumor cells. Circulating tumor cells entering
           the sinusoidal area are attacked by immune cells in the sinusoid, especially Kupffer cells and NK cells. These cells eliminate tumor cells
           via phagocytosis, cytotoxic granules, death-receptor pathways, nitric oxide, or ROS; B: extravasation of tumor cells into the hepatic
           parenchyma. Following firm attachment to LSEC via adhesion molecules such as E-selection, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1, tumor cells escape
           from the sinusoidal space and invade into the extrasinusoidal space, which is rich in various growth factors such as HGF and IGF-1; C:
           remodeling of hepatic parenchyma and angiogenic sprouting. Tumor cell invasion into the extrasinusoidal space triggers HSC and M2
           macrophage recruitment into the tumors and increases production of collagen in and around hepatic metastases. HSC recruited into the
           metastases as myofibroblasts release growth factors, cytokines, and MMPs. IL-8 produced by HSC induces the expression of VEGFR2
           and VEGF on endothelial cells and mediates autocrine and paracrine stimulation of vascular endothelium; D: rapid growth of hepatic
           metastasis. Vascular endothelial cells are further recruited to the tumor site and tumors become further vascularized. The vascularization of
           tumor results in rapid growth of metastasis. Local production of Th-2 type cytokines, deprivation of tryptophan, and elimination of activated
           T cells via PD-L/PD-L1 interaction result in non-T cell inflamed immune microenvironment in the hepatic metastasis. CXCR9: chemokine
           (C-X-C motif) ligand 9; CXCR10: chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10; CCR5: C-C chemokine receptor 5; Fas L: fas ligand; HSC: hepatic
           stellate cell; HGF: hepatocyte growth factor; IL-6: interleukin 6; IL-8: interleukin 8; IL-10: interleukin 10; IFN-g: interferon gamma; IGF-
           1: insulin growth factor-1; KC: kupffer cell; LSEC: liver sinusoidal endothelial cell; NO: nitric oxide; PD 1: programmed death 1; PD-L1:
           programmed death ligand 1; TDO: tryptophan 2,3 dioxtgenase; TGF-b: transforming growth factor beta; T reg: regulatory t Cell; VCAM-1:
           vascular cell adhesion protein 1; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; VLA-4: very late antigen 4; ROS: reactive oxygen species


           currently approved signal inhibitors for CM do not   identified a direction for future immunotherapy truly for
           work  for  metastatic  UM.  In  addition,  the  liver  is  one   metastatic UM.
           of the most tolerogenic immune microenvironments,
           especially in regard to the T cell immune system. Taken   LOCOREGIONAL TREATMENT
           together, metastatic UM is one of the most challenging
           tumors and convincing survival benefit of systemic and   The liver is the first and dominant site of metastasis in
           local treatments remains to be been seen.          UM, therefore it is reasonable to consider locoregional
                                                              immunotherapy to  directly destroy  the  tumor  and
           There  have  been  several  clinical  trials  using   provide tumor-related antigens to the systemic immune
           immunotherapy for metastatic UM  [Table 1]. These   system. We have developed one such approach
           clinical trials have provided important insights into the   called, “immunoembolization (IE)”.  This consists of
           immune microenvironment of metastatic UM and have   embolization of the  tumor-feeding hepatic artery  by

            238                                                                Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ October 31, 2017
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48