Page 44 - Read Online
P. 44

Terai et al.                                                                                                                                                                    The liver and metastatic uveal melanoma

           Table 1: Immunotherapy clinical trials in metastatic uveal melanoma

                                                                                     Targets and
           Study                                                Phase     Identifier                Status
                                                                                     approaches
           Nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating patients with MUM   Phase II   NCT01585194   PD-1 and   Recruiting
                                                                                    CTLA-4, MoAb
           Pembrolizumab in treating patients with advanced uveal melanoma   Phase II   NCT02359851   PD-1, MoAb   Ongoing but not
                                                                                                   recruiting
           Glembatumumab vedotin in treating patients with metastatic or locally   Phase II   NCT02363283   gpNMB, ADC   Recruiting
           recurrent uveal melanoma
           A study of the intra-patient escalation dosing regimen with IMCgp100 in  Phase I   NCT02570308  gp100, TCR-CD3   Recruiting
           patients with advanced uveal melanoma                                   Ab fusion protein
           Yttrium90, ipilimumab and nivolumab for uveal melanoma with liver   Phase I,   NCT02913417  PD-1 and CTLA-4   Recruiting
           metastases                                           Phase II            + radiospheres
           Dendritic cells plus autologous tumor RNA in uveal melanoma   Phase III   NCT01983748  DC plus mRNA   Recruiting
           Immunotherapy using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with   Phase II   NCT01814046   TIL   Ongoing but not
           metastatic ocular melanoma                                                              recruiting
           Trial of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in subjects with   Phase II   NCT02626962   PD-1 and   Ongoing but not
           previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma (GEM1402)                    CTLA-4      recruiting
           Epacadostat and vaccine therapy in treating patients with Stage III-IV   Phase II   NCT01961115  IDO1 inhibitor +  Ongoing but not
           melanoma                                                                 MELITAC 12.1   recruiting
                                                                                       Vaccine
           MUM: metastatic uveal melanoma; MoAb: monoclonal antibody; ADC: antibody-drug conjugate; TIL: tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; DC:
           dendritic cells; IDO: indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase. As of May 2017 [Clinical Trials. gov].

           gelatin  sponge  particles  following  arterial  infusion   of initiating a new phase 2 study, in which IE will be
           of  GM-CSF  emulsified  in  ethiodized  oil.  In  theory,   combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitors,
           metastatic UM cells will be killed by the ischemic effect   ipilimumab and nivolumab.
           of embolization; GM-CSF stimulates APCs and promotes
           uptake of tumor antigens, leading to the induction of T   Since hepatic metastasis is life-limiting in the majority
           cell activation in the liver and at a secondary lymph node.   of patients and the induction of anti-tumor response
           This approach could lead to the development of systemic   by traditional chemotherapies or immunotherapies
           immunity against melanoma and delay development    is  difficult,  various  liver-directed  treatments  have
           and progression of extra-hepatic metastasis.  This   been investigated including  percutaneous  hepatic
           concept was subsequently investigated in a clinical   perfusion with melphalan, intrahepatic arterial infusion
           trial setting. Compared with chemoembolization with   with fotemustine.  The impact of these liver-directed
           1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (CE), IE induced   treatments on tumor immune microenvironment in the
           significantly  better  overall  survival  (OS)  (20.4  vs. 9.8   liver remains to be investigated.
           months,  P  =  0.005)  and  systemic  progression  free
           survival (PFS) (12.4 vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.001) [55] .  SYSTEMIC IMMUNOTHERAPY

           In subsequent randomized double-blinded clinical trials,   Immune checkpoint blockade
           IE was compered with embolization of hepatic tumor   Development  and  approval  of  immune-modulatory
           with normal saline solution with ethiodized oil, “bland   antibodies against cytotoxic  T lymphocyte associated
           embolization (BE)” [56] . Overall survival was 21.5 months   antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and PD-1/PD-L1 resulted in aparadigm
           (95% CI: 18.5-24.8 months) with IE and 17.2 months   shift in the treatment of metastatic CM [57-59]  and provided
           (95% CI: 11.9-22.4 months) with BE.  The degree of   hope for patients with this disease. Unfortunately,
           proinflammatory cytokine production was more robust   this new approach did not improve the outcome of
           after  IE.  TNF-α,  IL-6,  and  IL-8  levels  in  serum  were   metastatic  UM.  Disappointing  response  rates have
           increased with IE 1 h and 18 h after the embolization   been reported with anti-CTLA-4 antibody as well as
           procedures. On the other hand, IL-6 and IL-8 levels   with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatments in metastatic
           in  serum  in BE  were  mildly  increased  18  h  after  the   UM [60,61] . In the retrospective collection of data on 82
           procedures.  The  higher  degree  of  cytokine  release   assessable UM patients who received ipilimumab, the
           after IE was correlated with longer time to “systemic”   fully  human  monoclonal  antibody  against  CTLA-4,  at
           extrahepatic progression. In the IE group, higher IL-6   3 mg/kg, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 doses, 4
           levels at 1 h (P < 0.001) and IL-8 levels at 18 h after   (5%) had an immune-related objective response and 24
           the procedure (P < 0.001) were significant predictors of   (29%) had immune-related stable disease lasting
           longer systemic PFS. We are currently in the process   ≥  3  months. With a median follow-up of 5.6 months,


                           Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ October 31, 2017       239
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49