Page 59 - Read Online
P. 59

Sun et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(4):355­70  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2022.23   Page 365



























                                   Figure 16. Grasping structure diagram of an ROV multifunctional manipulator.


               4. ROV POOL TEST IN OFFSHORE UNDERWATER RESCUE
               After the underwater machine prototype is assembled, a series of tests are required, which are mainly divided
               into indoor and outdoor tests. The indoor test mainly focuses on the power-on test of the sealed cabin to check
               whether the electronic components in the cabin operate normally and whether there is an alarm sound, so as
               to ensure the normal use of the system and test whether a single motor can operate normally and whether
               the overall operation can operate normally. The control board circuit in the electronic cabin was powered
               on to test whether the indicator light was normal to ensure that the underwater robot could move normally.
               Through the external frames and bottom plates on both sides, the assembly was completed with M6 screws, six
               thrusters, and four LED lights. The control board, processor, and power module were fixed in the electronic
               sealed cabin, and the expansion layer was equipped with a multifunctional manipulator.


               4.1. Search and rescue ROV motion performance pool test
               Thepremiseofrealizingthegraspingfunctionofanunderwaterrobotistotestthebasicfunctionsofsixdegrees
               of freedom. It mainly tests the underwater mobility and flexibility of the underwater robot, and whether it can
               complete the mechanical grasping of the underwater vehicle.



               The following tests were carried out: (1) The air tightness test of the manual vacuum pump was performed
               before launching under indoor observation for 24 h to check whether there was water accumulation in the
               sealed cabin and its sealing performance. (2) Switch lamp experiments were performed to check the underwa-
               ter waterproofing and other functions. (3) The PTZ camera was debugged to test the stability of the platform
               camera and the ability to perform the up and down flip angles. (4) Whether the image transmission is normal
               and whether the image information can be transmitted were tested. (5) We verified the basic motion functions
               of the underwater vehicle in water, such as forward, backward, steering, diving, etc. (6) We verified the func-
               tions of controlling navigation and target searching and grabbing, as well as the key technical indicators, such
               as ROV speed, underwater search and rescue, and other specific indicators on the lake. The crane was used to
               lift and release the ROV, and the ROV positioning point was controlled to conduct high-speed navigation on
               the water surface corresponding to the location, straight driving, curved driving, turning in place, diving and
               floating, and directional and fixed depth navigation. The real object and test experiment of the ROV system
               are shown in Figure 17.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64