Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Page 35                             Ayass et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(1):20-36  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2021.07

               By the proposed architecture, the handover process proved to be effective to mitigate handover issues in
               FANETs, since it achieved superior results in both QoS and QoE parameters, proving itself as a viable
               proposal.


               6. CONCLUSIONS
               In the context of fifth-generation networks, new connectivity alternatives emerge, such as the use of UAVs
               as an access point, mainly for locations with difficult access or without available network infrastructure.

               To set up fast and temporary networks, FANETs are used in different scenarios to provide 5G access to
               users, but, due to the mobility of UAVs and the users themselves, the network topology is constantly
               modified. The constant topology changes in FANET due to mobility can disrupt the user’s connection.


               Thus, this paper proposes a FANET as an alternative way of connecting to 5G networks, in which drones
               work as access points for users. The paper also proposes the use of a fuzzy system for UAV mobility
               management for anticipating handovers to avoid network connection breaks.

               The results prove a better performance when compared to a traditional FANET (without the use of the
               fuzzy system). The results were proven through the throughput metric and QoE metrics (for video
               transmissions), as well as the shown frames of transmitted videos. As future work, we intend to use other
               artificial intelligence techniques, as well as other wireless transmission technologies.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Literature review, research/methodology design, writing the manuscript from initial writing until
               submission, revision of the manuscript according to reviewers’ comments, data collection, result analysis
               and interpretation: Ayass T
               Literature review, writing the manuscript from initial writing until submission, revision of the manuscript
               according to reviewers’ comments, result analysis and interpretation: Coqueiro T
               Formulation of the initial research proposal, research/methodology design, writing the manuscript from
               initial writing until submission, revision of the manuscript according to reviewers’ comments, result
               analysis and interpretation: Carvalho T
               Formulation of the initial research proposal, research/methodology design, technical guidance and
               assistance to methodology, writing the manuscript from initial writing until submission, revision of the
               manuscript according to reviewers’ comments, co-researcher of the student: Jailton J
               Formulation of the initial research proposal, literature review, technical guidance and assistance to
               methodology, writing the manuscript from initial writing until submission, co-researcher of the student:
               Araújo J
               Formulation of the initial research proposal, technical guidance and assistance to methodology,
               researcher/supervisor of the project and student: Francês R


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45