Page 39 - Read Online
P. 39
Ayass et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(1):20-36 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2021.07 Page 34
Figure 9. Structural similarity metric traditional (A) and fuzzy handover (B).
Figure 10. Video quality metric traditional (A) and fuzzy handover (B).
Figure 11. Frames comparison without fuzzy (A) and with the fuzzy proposal (B).
From the simulations and evaluative analysis on the performance of both the conventional handover model
and the proposed one, it is possible to see the traditional model does not satisfy the peculiarities of these
networks and their components, causing the low quality of service, compromising the quality of experience
of the user, and not guaranteeing a transparent handover, which impacts the continuity of the service.
