Page 58 - Read Online
P. 58

Wang et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(4):538-64  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.30  Page 25 of 27


























                                    Figure 16. Comparison of the search results using different search methods.


               Table 8. Average number of targets found using different search methods at simulation step    = 100 without any prior information of the
               probability distribution of target position
                                                       = 3                              = 6
                      Number of targets
                                    Greedy search  Parallel search  CSMTPE  Greedy search  Parallel search  CSMTPE
                                = 1     0.38       0.58      0.73                   —
                                = 2     0.95       1.23      1.35        1.20        1.43      1.53
                                = 3               —                      1.53        1.95      2.15
                                = 4               —                      2.25        2.53     2.68


               less than that of CSMTPE at simulation step    = 25, reflecting that it wasted more search steps due to blind
               search in the early stage of the search, while the number of targets found in parallel search method is related
               to the target distribution, resulting the poor search efficiency. In contrast, the CSMTPE proposed in this
               paper continuously updates various search information maps to obtain more target information and takes into
               account both short-term and long-term search efficiency when planning search paths.

               Considering the existence of situations where the prior information of the target is unknown, the original
               problem will degenerate into a covering search problem. Under this circumstance, another similar experiment
               is conducted, and the search results are shown in Table 8.

               When the prior information of the target is unknown, the search results reflect the conclusion that the search
               efficiency ofCSMTPE will degenerateinto the level of that using theparallel search method. Meanwhile, it also
               shows that the greedy search method performs significantly worse compared to other search methods above
               due to the lack of long-term predictability. In summary, it proves that CSMTPE can adaptively and effectively
               solve the multi-UAV regional cooperative search problem.



               7. CONCLUSIONS
               This paper addresses a challenging multi-UAV regional cooperative search problem for targets with the ability
               to perceive and evade. In this scenario, moving targets can detect the presence of UAVs and take evasive
               actions based on the UAVs’ motion patterns, increasing the difficulty of target search. To solve this problem,
               we propose a novel search method called the CSMTPE for multi-UAV.


               Firstly, we defined the motion model of such targets and design various search information maps and their
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63