Page 57 - Read Online
P. 57

Wang et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(3):479-94  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.26  Page 11 of 16


                                              Table 1. Configuration parameters of robots
                          Torso                                                                    Calf
                Parameter        Thigh length  Calf length  Trunk mass  Thigh mass  Calf length  Thigh rotational inertia
                          length                                                                   rotational inertia
                 Value unit  0.204 m  0.412 m  0.385 m  5.9 kg  13.2 kg  7.7 kg   0.56        2    0.28        2
























                                           Figure 4. The absolute joint angles       vary with time.


               According to the Barbarat lemma, we obtain lim t→∞   (  ) = 0; hence, the system can be asymptotically stable
               when lim   →∞   (  ) = 0. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.



               5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
               ToverifythecontrolmethodsgiveninSection3andSection4,simulationsareimplemented. Theconfiguration
               parameters of robots are shown in Table 1.


               Figure 4 shows that the absolute joint angles qi vary with the time of the biped robot in the duration of walking.
               It shows that the phase of each joint is reset based on the foot contact information at the beginning of each
               step. The trajectories of each joint are smooth and periodic.   1 and   2 have a jump in every period, indicating
               the switch between the swing leg and support leg. Figure 4 illustrates a phase diagram of the joint angle     
               and joint angular velocity      during the walking process, which are all limited circles to prove that the walking
               process can achieve asymptotic stability. In Figure 5, the straight lines indicate the discrete instance of the
               walking gait. It stands for the fact that the swinging leg has an impulsive action on the ground, and the joint
               angular velocity      has a sudden change at the same time.

               Figure 6 shows the total energy of the system changes over time in the body and inertial frame, respectively.
               Figure 7 shows the stride length. Figure 8 shows the hip position in the body and inertial frame, and its velocity
               is shown in Figure 9.

               Let external disturbance       = [exp(−0.1  )] 6×1 be exerted on the link 2 when t = 2.5 s. This will lead to the
               changes of the inertia matrix, Coriolis force matrix, and gravity matrix of the robot system, which is equivalent
               to introducing the the model uncertainty. Set the error upper bound    = 1, and the boundary layer thickness
               is set as 0.01. The simulation results are shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11.

               Figure 10 depicts the tracking effect of each joint. The blue solid line and the red dotted line represent the
               actual position and desired position of each joint in the walking process, respectively. The simulation results
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62