Page 177 - Read Online
P. 177

Page 237                           Li et al. Intell Robot 2024;4(3):230-43  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2024.15


                                                                       Fully connected
                                   Input layer  GRU layer  GRU layer  Attention layer  layer  Output layer

                                      x0     h0      h0     h0
                                                                                  o0
                                                                a0
                                      x1     h1      h1     h1  a1
                                                                a2         SoftMax
                                                                                  o1
                                      x2     h2      h2     h2
                                                                ai
                                                                                  o2
                                      ...
                                                             ...
                                                     ...
                                              ...
                                      xi     hi      hi     hi
                                  Figure 5. Structure of Attention-GRU network model. GRU: Gated recurrent unit.














                                                 Figure 6. Experimental driving path.


               3. RESULTS
               3.1 Experimental data
               In this paper, the experimental data sampling path is a 270 km long section of Beijing-Harbin Expressway
               from Beijing to Qinhuangdao [Figure 6]. The number of participants is 8, the acquisition time is 1-3 h, and
               the acquisition frequency is 100 Hz. The collected data are sliced according to the standard of about 1 min,
               and the consistency of the sliced driving behavior data with the driver’s facial video is determined according
               to the synchronization pulse signal. Each segment was scored as 0 (awake), 1 (fatigued) and 2 (very fatigued)
               according to the driver’s facial fatigue score. A new fatigue driving sample dataset was obtained. The vehicle
               speed below 60 km/h in the dataset is considered as indicating slow sections, and the steering wheel turning
               angle over 20° is considered as indicative of overtaking lane change. There are 243 sober samples, 71 fatigue
               samples and 30 very fatigue samples after excluding these abnormal data, totaling 237 samples. Considering
               the unbalanced and too few samples of the three-level fatigue samples, the smote method was used to expand
               171 fatigue samples and 212 very fatigue samples, each containing 12 dimensions and 6,000 lines of operation
               behavior data.


               3.2 Data analysis
               The fatigue state induces psychological and physiological changes in the driver, leading to a decrease in the
               driver’s control accuracy over the vehicle and subsequent abnormal operating behaviors. Consequently, mon-
               itoring indicators related to driving operation behaviors allows for a real-time assessment of the driver’s state.
               The SWA , being the device most directly manipulated by the driver, is also the most frequently operated. The
               data is illustrated in Figure 7 [24] . In the awake state, the SWA exhibits frequent fluctuations with a small am-
               plitude. In the fatigue state, the fluctuation amplitude increases, and in a very fatigued state, the SWA may
               show stationary motion with significant fluctuations. The driver modulates vehicle speed through the throttle
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182