Page 649 - Read Online
P. 649
Page 8 of 9 John et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:56 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.37
the various modalities are needed to elucidate comparative long-term outcomes of RT specifically. Dose
selection is currently arbitrary, based on lesion size, location and liver function. However, we acknowledge
that the spectrum of primary tumours may have varying radio-sensitivity, and an attempt to tailor the
[36]
dose (biologically-guided treatment), according to the different primaries, should be investigated . In
addition, the patient and disease should be considered holistically. As such, multidisciplinary discussion
and collaboration between surgeons, interventional radiologists and oncologists is crucial. Treatment
options should be personalized, with the pros and cons of each therapy balanced against the risk of disease
progression. On the other end of the palliative spectrum, low-dose whole or partial liver radiotherapy may
be used for patients with high disease burden and severe symptoms.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work: John RG, Vellayappan BA
Drafted the manuscript: John RG, Appalanaido GK, Vellayappan BA
Reviewed the manuscript and provided approval for publication of the content: John RG, Ho F,
Appalanaido GK, Chen D, Tey J, Soon YY, Vellayappan BA
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
REFERENCES
1. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, Köhne CH, Pozzo C, et al. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with
colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2212-21.
2. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic
colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999;230:309-18.
3. Pan CC, Kavanagh BD, Dawson LA, Li XA, Das SK, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S94-
100.
4. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:8-10.
5. Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in
patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet 2019;393:2051-8.
6. Potters L, Kavanagh B, Galvin JM, Hevezi JM, Janjan NA, et al. American society for therapeutic radiology and oncology (ASTRO) and
American college of radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys 2010;76:326-32.
7. Scorsetti M, Comito T, Tozzi A, Navarria P, Fogliata A, et al. Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for
patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015;14:543-53.
8. Goodman BD, Mannina EM, Althouse SK, Maluccio MA, Cárdenes HR. Long-term safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation