Page 649 - Read Online
P. 649

Page 8 of 9                                              John et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:56  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.37

               the various modalities are needed to elucidate comparative long-term outcomes of RT specifically. Dose
               selection is currently arbitrary, based on lesion size, location and liver function. However, we acknowledge
               that the spectrum of primary tumours may have varying radio-sensitivity, and an attempt to tailor the
                                                                                                     [36]
               dose (biologically-guided treatment), according to the different primaries, should be investigated . In
               addition, the patient and disease should be considered holistically. As such, multidisciplinary discussion
               and collaboration between surgeons, interventional radiologists and oncologists is crucial. Treatment
               options should be personalized, with the pros and cons of each therapy balanced against the risk of disease
               progression. On the other end of the palliative spectrum, low-dose whole or partial liver radiotherapy may
               be used for patients with high disease burden and severe symptoms.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work: John RG, Vellayappan BA
               Drafted the manuscript: John RG, Appalanaido GK, Vellayappan BA
               Reviewed the manuscript and provided approval for publication of the content: John RG, Ho F,
               Appalanaido GK, Chen D, Tey J, Soon YY, Vellayappan BA


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, Köhne CH, Pozzo C, et al. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with
                   colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2212-21.
               2.   Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic
                   colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1999;230:309-18.
               3.   Pan CC, Kavanagh BD, Dawson LA, Li XA, Das SK, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S94-
                   100.
               4.   Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:8-10.
               5.   Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in
                   patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet 2019;393:2051-8.
               6.   Potters L, Kavanagh B, Galvin JM, Hevezi JM, Janjan NA, et al. American society for therapeutic radiology and oncology (ASTRO) and
                   American college of radiology (ACR) practice guideline for the performance of stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol
                   Biol Phys 2010;76:326-32.
               7.   Scorsetti M, Comito T, Tozzi A, Navarria P, Fogliata A, et al. Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for
                   patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015;14:543-53.
               8.   Goodman BD, Mannina EM, Althouse SK, Maluccio MA, Cárdenes HR. Long-term safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation
   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654