Page 496 - Read Online
P. 496

Zeng et al. Hepatoma Res2020;6:43  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.29                                                Page 3 of 12


               Table 1. Outcomes of small-sized liver cancers after SBRT
                                                                Response(%)  Overall survival(%)  Local control (%)
               Authors     Year    HCC status  Cases Dose to tumors
                                                                CR PR SD PD 1-Y 2-Y 3-Y 5-Y 1-Y   2-Y  3-Y
               Kimura et al. [1]  2018 BCLC 0 53.3%; BCLC   28  48Gy/4Fx       78.6          95.4  95.4
                              A 46.7%, Inoperable or   122 TACE + 48Gy/4Fx     80.3
                              unsuitable RFA, or refusal
                              operation or RFA                                               99.2  98.5
               Takeda et al. [2]  2016 BCLC 0-A 84%, C 16%,   90  35Gy/5Fx (10%);   95.5 80.0 66.7  98.8  96.3  96.3
                              Salvage SBRT 42%, initial   40Gy/5Fx (90%)
                              SBRT 36%, intrahepatic
                              recurrence 22%
               Su et al. [3]  2016 Max. Ø ≤ 5 cm; BCLC   132 42 - 46Gy/3 - 5Fx  94.1  73.5 64.3 90.9
                              stage A 55.3%, B 44.7%,
                              CP A 86.4%, CP B 13.6%
               Wahl et al. [4]  2016 Max Ø < 3 cm 73.1%; 3   63  30Gy/3Fx -    74  46        97.4  83.8
                              cm ≤ Ø < 5 cm 23.2%; Ø   50Gy/5Fx
                              ≥ 5 cm 3.7%, CP A 68.7%,
                              B 28.9%, C 2.4%
               Huertas et al. [5]  2015 Ø ≤ 6cm, CP: A5-B8,   77  45Gy/3Fx, 2Fx/W  81.8 56.6  99  99
                              ECOG ≤ 2, nodules ≤ 3;
                              AJCC stage I 28.6%, II
                              68.8%, IIIa 1.3%, IIIb 1.3%
               Yamashita et al. [6]  2014 AJCC stage I37%, stage   79  BED10 = 96.3Gy   45.6 35.4 11.4 5.1  52.9  74.8
                              II 27%, stage III 8%,   (75-106).
                              recurrence 14%, no stage:   40Gy/4Fx -
                              14%                   60Gy/10Fx
               Lo et al. [7]  2014 BCLC A 5.7%; B 11.3%; C   53  40Gy/4 - 5Fx  32.8 38.8 23.9 4.5  70.1 45.4  73.3  66.8
                              83.0%
               Sanuki et al. [8]  2014 ≤ 5 cm. T1 84.3%; T2   185 CP A: 40Gy/5Fx   95  83  70  99  93  91
                              11.4%; T3 4.3%        CP B:35Gy/5Fx
               Tekeda et al. [9]  2014 T1: 68.3%, T2: 15.9%,   63  35 - 40Gy/5Fx  80.7 17.7 1.6  0  100  87  73  100  95  92
                              T3:15.8%
               Yoon et al. [10]  2013 Ø < 6 cm; ≤ 3 nodules;   93  30 - 60Gy/3Fx  51.5 21.4 25.2 0  86  53.8  94.8  92.1
                              CP A or B; normal liver
                              volume > 700 mL;
                              distance between tumor
                              and GI > 2 cm; 92 pts pre-
                              treatment failure
               Jang et al. [11]  2013 BCLC A: 53%; B: 29%; C:   82  33 - 60Gy/3Fx  63     39      87
                              18%. Ø < 7 cm
               Bibault et al. [12]  2013 BCLC A: 62.7%; B: 13.3%;   75  24 - 45Gy/3Fx   78.5 50.4  89.8  89.8
                              C: 24%. 51% treated with   (median 45 Gy)
                              other therapies
               Park et al. [13]  2013 Ø < 6 cm; nodules ≤ 3;   26  40 - 50Gy/4-5Fx  25  42.9 32.1 0  88.5 67.2  87.6
                              normal liver volume > 700
                              mL; tumor between GI > 2
                              cm
               SBRT: stereotactic body radiation therapy; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; CR: complete response; PR: partial response; SD:
               stable disease; PD: progressive disease; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; TACE: transarterial
               chemoembolization; CP: Child-Pugh Classification; Ø: diameter; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; AJCC: American Joint
               Committee on Cancer; BED: biologically equivalent dose; GI: gastrointestine


               RADIATION DOSE
               The SBRT dose to HCC has been significantly associated with OS (P = 0.005) in multivariate analysis. High-
                                                                                          [11]
               dose SBRT may increase local control and improve OS in patients with inoperable HCC . In most studies
               described in the literature, a biologically-equivalent dose (BED) 10 of > 80 Gy has been delivered to the
               tumors [Table 1]. Of the 11 typical patients discussed in this manuscript, all received BED10 of ≥ 78 Gy and
               are alive and well. Although no evidence has emerged to clearly support a minimum or maximum dose of
               SBRT for HCC, we recommend BED10 of ≥ 80 Gy.


               INDICATIONS FOR SBRT
               SBRT may be an effective therapeutic option for early-stage HCC (as defined above). Patients with early-
               stage HCC usually undergo surgical resection or RFA attempts, unless contraindicated. However, SBRT can
   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501