Page 149 - Read Online
P. 149

Page 10 of 11                                             Tsutsui et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.20


               we think that effective adjuvant therapy in addition to preoperative HAIC is crucial for further improved
               prognosis, we could not show the sufficient efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Further prospective
               multicenter trials are required to establish the effectiveness of neoadjuvant HAIC for the treatment of HCC.

               In conclusion, neoadjuvant HAIC for patients with HCC with a high-grade malignant phenotype decreases
               the risk of recurrence and improves survival without serious complications. However, a prospective
               randomized study is required to confirm our findings.


               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contributions
               Conceived of the presented idea and developed theory: Tsutsui R, Nagamatsu H, Itano O
               Contributed to the interpretation of the results: Deguchi A, Tsutsumi T, Hiraki M, Mizukami N, Akiba J
               Provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript: Tsutsui R, Nagamatsu H,
               Itano O, Deguchi A, Tsutsumi T, Hiraki M, Mizukami N, Akiban J

               Data source and availability
               The data presented is original and obtained in our laboratory. It is available with the authors and can be
               made available if required.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               There are no conflicts of interest.

               Patient consent
               Written informed consent from all the patients of the treatment group was obtained as part of the involvement
               in this study.

               Ethics approval
               The study was reviewed and approved by the Yame General Hospital Institutional Review Board.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.


               REFERENCES
               1.   European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical
                   practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:908-43.
               2.   Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular
                   carcinoma. Ann Surg 2005;242:252-9.
               3.   Belghiti J, Panis Y, Farges O, Benhamou JP, Fekete F. Intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepato- cellular carcinoma complicating
                   cirrhosis. Ann Surg 1991;214:114-7.
               4.   Fan ST, Ng IO, Poon RT, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: the surgeon’s role in long-term survival.
                   Arch Surg 1999;134:1124-30.
               5.   Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Miyagawa Y, Ishida K, Shimada R, Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S. Prognostic significance of
                   anatomical resection and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 1999;86:1032-8.
               6.   Chan KM, Yu MC, Wu TJ, Lee CF, Chen TC, Lee WC, Chen MF. Efficacy of surgical resection in management of isolated extrahepatic
                   metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:5481-8.
               7.   Taketomi A, Toshima T, Kitagawa D, Motomura T, Takeishi K, Mano Y, Kayashima H, Sugimachi K, Aishima S, Yamashita Y, Ikegami
                   T, Gion T, Uchiyama H, Soejima Y, Maeda T, Shirabe K, Maehara Y. Predictors of extrahepatic recurrence after curative hepatectomy for
                   hepato- cellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2740-6.
               8.   Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM. Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma - an updated analysis of
                   randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:1535-47.
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154