Page 147 - Read Online
P. 147

Page 8 of 11                                              Tsutsui et al. Hepatoma Res 2018;4:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2018.20


               Table 6. Histopathology of resected livers: treatment group versus control group
                Variables                          Treatment group (n = 13)  Control group (n = 36)  P
                Tumor size (mm)*                        27 (14-50)            25 (10-58)          0.666
                Number of tumor (n)*                    1.0 (1-2)             1.0 (1-3)           0.560
                Microscopic vascular invasion           3                     18                  0.131
                Intrahepatic metastasises               5                     10                  0.476
                Gross classification
                  SN/SNEG/CMN                           4/4/4                 7/21/8              0.535
                Histologic grade                                                                  0.202
                  Well differentiated                   1                     1
                  Moderately differentiated             8                     32
                  Poorly differentiated                 3                     3
                Liver cirrhosis**                                                                 0.227
                  F0                                    2                     3
                  F1-F2                                 6                     8
                  F3-F4                                 5                     25
                JBCS
                  Grade 0                               3                     -
                  Grade 1 (1a/1b)                       3/3                   -
                  Grade 2 (2a/2b)                       2/1                   -
                  Grade 3                               1                     -
               *Median with range; **new Inuyama classification. SN: simple nodular type; SNEG: simple nodular type with extranodular growth; CMN:
               confluent mutinodular type; JBCS: Japanese Brest Cancer Society
































                   Figure 2. Overall survival curves after hepatic resection in the treatment group (dashed line) and the control groups (solid line)

               The regimen selected for this study was 2 weeks of low-dose FP. Ishikawa et al. [29,30]  first reported that
               HAIC with cisplatin before radical local treatment (radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous ethanol injection
               therapy) for early-stage HCC prevented intrahepatic metastasis and prolonged the survival time. According
                                                                                         [28]
               to some clinical studies, the efficacy of low-dose FP is better than that of cisplatin alone . Ueshima et al.
                                                                                                        [31]
               reported that HAIC using low-dose FP (continuous arterial infusion of 5-FU and cisplatin for the first
               2 weeks followed by a single dose of cisplatin and 5-FU once a week) is an effective treatment for locally
               advanced HCC. In our experience, almost all HAIC responders exhibited a decrease in tumor marker ratios
               in the early stage of treatment; thus, we believe 2 weeks of low-dose FP was sufficient to observe the effect of
               chemotherapy. HAIC-related liver toxicity is caused by complications associated with catheter placement,
               such as catheter dislocation, hepatic artery occlusion and stenosis, and infection. The 2-week regimen
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152