Page 270 - Read Online
P. 270

Lecchini et al.                                                                                                                                                         HCC vascular invasion in sorafenib treatment

           Table 1: Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of   Table 2: Anatomical and functional characteristics of
           patient population at baseline                     hepatocellular carcinoma
           Characteristics                      Data          Characteristics                       Data
           Gender                                             Location of tumour
              Male                            63 (74%)           Monolobar                       65/84 (77.5%)
              Female                          21 (26%)           Bilobar                         19/84 (22.5%)
           Age (median years, IQR)            73 (67-75)      Extrahepatic spread
           BMI (median, IQR)                  25 (23-28)         Absent                          52/84 (62%)
           Comorbidities  (yes/no)        39 (46.5%)/45 (53.5%)     Present                      32/84 (38%)
              Hypertension                      29/39         Macroscopic vascular invasion
              Diabetes mellitus                 16/39            Absent                          37/84 (44%)
              Cardiovascular events             11/39            Present                         47/84 (56%)
              COPD                              9/39          Metastasis and macroscopic vascular invasion
              Other tumours                     8/39             Both present                    20/84 (24%)
              Kidney disease                    0/39             Both absent                     27/84 (32%)
           Etiology                                           Tumour marker at the beginning of therapy
              HCV                            46/84 (54.5%)       Alpha-fetoprotein (median ng/mL)  130.5 (range 1-65,671)
              HBV                             3/84 (3.5%)
              HBV + HCV                       7/84 (8.5%)
              Alcohol and/or dysmetabolic    21/84 (25%)      Sorafenib management and toxicity
              Other or unknown                7/84 (8.5%)     Toxicity was evaluated according to National Cancer
           Child-Pugh score                                   Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse
              A5                             21/84 (25%)      Events version 4.0 [20]  every 4 weeks. According to the
              A6                             56/84 (66.5%)
              B7                              7/84 (8.5%)     grade of the event, a dose reduction or suspension of
           Previous treatments (yes/no)    69 (82%)/15 (18%)  the treatment was planned. For grade 1 adverse events
              Resection                         23/69         it was advised to institute supportive measures and
              Loco-regional treatments          60/69
                RFTA                            46/60         continue sorafenib treatment; at first appearance of
                TACE                            39/60         grade 2 adverse events it was suggested to establish
                PEI                             31/60         support measures and reduce sorafenib at 400 mg/day
              Resection + loco-regional treatments  14/69
                                                              for 28 days: if toxicity regressed to grade 1, it was
           IQR: interquartile range; BMI: body mass index; COPD: chronic   indicated to re-increase the dose at 400 mg twice
           obstructive pulmonary disease; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HBV:   daily, otherwise it was recommended to discontinue
           hepatitis B virus; RFTA: radiofrequency thermal ablation; TACE:   sorafenib for at least 7 days then 400 mg/day, finally
           transarterial chemoembolization; PEI: percutaneous ethanol
           injection                                          the full dose. At the appearance of the second or third
                                                              potential grade 2 toxicity, sorafenib was permanently
           (diarrhea, skin rash, high blood pressure, edema), the   administered at the reduced dose of 400 mg/day. In
           evaluation of blood tests examinations such as liver   case of the fourth appearance of grade 2 adverse
           function tests (transaminases, albumin, bilirubin), renal   event it was considered the definitive suspension
           function (creatinine, urea, electrolytes), coagulation   of treatment. At the occurrence of grade 3 toxicity,
           parameters (prothrombin time), lipase, creatine-   sorafenib was interrupted for at least 7 days or until the
           phosphokinase and the alpha-fetoprotein dosage. It   decrease to grade 0-1, then prescribed at a low dose
           was allowed to reduce sorafenib dose to limit adverse   (400 mg/day) and further increased to 400 mg twice
           effects of treatment. A thorax-abdomen CT scan with   a day. At the second appearance of grade 3 adverse
           contrast was scheduled at 8 weeks of treatment. The   event, the conduct was the same, but at the time of
           instrumental response to treatment was evaluated   resumption sorafenib was definitely prescribed a low
           according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in   dose (400 mg/day). In some cases, it was performed a
           Solid Tumors criteria [11,12] : complete response (CR) was   treatment with lower doses than indicated above, up to
           defined as the disappearance of intra-tumoral arterial   a minimum of 200 mg/day.
           enhancement in all target lesions, partial response (PR)
           as a reduction > 30% of the sum of the diameters of   Statistical analysis
           the vital areas in the parameter lesions and progressive   Survival curves are expressed by Kaplan-Meier curves
           disease (PD) as an increase of > 20% of the sum of the   and compared with log-rank test. Cox proportional
           diameters of the vital areas in the parameter lesions,   hazards model was used for multivariate analysis
           compared to the baseline size. Stable disease (SD)   of survival. The variables associated with survival
           included all the other cases not classified as PR or   showing a P value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were
           PD. In patients classified as not applied, therapy was   included in the multivariate analysis model, except
           interrupted before 8 weeks because of liver failure,   response rate that was not available for all patients.
           adverse events or poor performance status.         Prism (Graph Pad) and StatPlus (AnalystSoft Inc.)

            262                                                                                                     Hepatoma Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ November 16, 2017
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275