Page 103 - Read Online
P. 103

Post-operative management                          of normal liver. The deepest ablations were performed
           Five patients were transferred to the Intensive Care Unit   before the superficial ones to minimize the possibility
           and were under observation until patients became stable.   of micro bubbles that might obscure visualization of
           A naso-gasteric tube was left for 24 h. Patients started   the deepest portions of the tumor and thus prevent
           oral fluids when intestinal sounds became audible, and   complete  ablation.  In  our  cases,  we  ablated  the  tract
           gradually returned to a normal diet. Ambulance was   before removal of the needle.
           started as early as possible. Drains were removed when
           below 100 mL (usually the 4th day). Hospital stay keep   Post-ablation care
           as short as possible to avoid hospital acquired infection,   IV antiemetic was given. Strong IV analgesics were given
           ranging from 5 days to 7 days.                     to control pain. All patients were observed clinically for
                                                              2-3 h in the Radiology Department to detect any acute
           In the  same period,  20  consecutive  patients  with   complications (like bleeding, shock and injury to other
           HCC (12 males, 8 females; average age: 54.3 years;   organs) and to start IV fluid. Prophylactic antibiotics were
           range:  48-66  years)  underwent  percutaneous  RFA  at   started and continued for 3 days.
           Zagazig University Hospitals, Interventional Radiology
           Department [Figure 4].                             RESULTS

           Thirteen of them were treated using the Radionics cool   Sociodemographic characteristics of patients
           tip needle (4 ablated by the single probe and 8 by the   We compared tumor characteristics in the two different
           cluster probe). Seven patients were treated using the   treatment groups (Child-Pugh score, tumor number,
           Rita  needle with  expandable hooks. Fifteen  patients   tumor diameter and AFP levels), as shown in Table 1.
           were treated with a single electrode insertion, 4 with
           double insertions and in one case, by three insertions.   Group A: Resection
           Only 1 patient received a second session of RFA due   A total of 20 consecutive patients with HCC (13 males,
           to a residual tumor detected by the 1-month follow-up   7 females; average age: 53.4 years; range: 45-62 years)
           triphasic CT study.                                underwent HR. The etiology of the patients’ underlying
                                                              liver disease were characterized by 20 patients with
           Local anesthesia was performed on the entry site of the   chronic hepatitis (hepatitis B: 3; hepatitis C: 14; hepatitis
           skin to the liver capsule along the needle track with 10 mL   B + C: 3). On the other hand, 17 had Child A and 3 had
           of 2% xylocaine. Most of the patients undergoing RFA were   Child B, according to the Child-Pugh scoring system.
           treated under general intravenous (IV) anesthesia.
                                                              Group B: Radiofrequency ablation
           The objective in treating the tumors was to ablate the   A total of 20 consecutive patients with HCC (12 males,
           entire tumor and an at least 1 cm tumor-free margin   8 females; average age: 54.3 years; range: 48-66
                                                              years) underwent RFA interventional in the Radiology
                                                              Department. The etiology of the patients’ underlying
                                                              liver disease was characterized by 20 patients with
                                                              chronic hepatitis (hepatitis B: 4; hepatitis C: 14; hepatitis
                                                              B + C: 2). Of these patients, 12 had Child A and 8 Child B.

                                                              Table 1: Tumors characteristics in the two different
                                                              treatment groups
                                                               Underlying cirrhosis  Group  A     Group  B
                                                                                 HR (n = 20) (%)  RFA (n = 20) (%)
                                                               Child-Pugh score
                                                                 A                   17 (85)       12 (60)
                                                                 B                   3 (15)         8 (40)
                                                               Number of tumors
                                                                 Single              18 (90)       13 (65)
                                                                 Multinodular        2 (10)         7 (35)
                                                               Tumor diameter
           Figure 4: (a) Arterial contrast enhanced triphasic computerized tomography   maximum 7.5 cm
           shows right lobe (segment 6) hepatocellular carcinoma about 16 mm × 14   ≤ 3 cm  5 (25)  4 (20)
           mm; (b) arterial phase 1 month after RFA; (c) arterial phase 3 months after   > 3 cm  15 (75)  16 (80)
           RFA; (d) arterial phase 9 months after RFA. In b, c and d, no enhancement   AFP levels (ng/mL)
           of the ablated right lobe. Significant decrease in mass size is noted. RFA:   ≤ 20  3 (15)  2 (10)
           radiofrequency ablation                               > 20                17 (85)       18 (90)
                                                              RFA: radiofrequency ablation; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; HR: hepatic resection

            94                                                            Hepatoma Research | Volume 2 | April 1, 2016
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108