Page 73 - Read Online
P. 73

Page 14 of 15                                             Kato et al. Hepatoma Res 2021;7:10  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.129

               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The authors thank Akira Yasuda, Takeshi Takahara, Yoshinao Tanahashi, Masayuki Kojima, Sanae
               Nakajima, Gozo Kiguchi, Yuichiro Uchida and Junichi Yoshikawa for their substantial contributions to
               surgery and preparation of the manuscript.
               We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

               Authors’ contributions
               Concepts and design of the study and data acquisition, analysis and interpretation: Kato Y, Sugioka A,
               Uyama I
               Performance of surgery: Kato Y, Uyama I
               Technical support: Sugioka A, Uyama I
               Administrative and material support: Sugioka A, Uyama I


               Availability of data and materials
               The datasets are not available for public access due to patient privacy concerns but are available from the
               corresponding author on reasonable request.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflict of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The study was conducted under the approval of Institutional Regulation Board (approval number: HM19-
               064) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000). Written informed consent was obtained
               from all patients.

               Consent for publication
               Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all patients.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Suda K, Nakauchi M, Inaba K, Ishida Y, Uyama I. Robotic surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: current status and future
                   perspectives. Dig Endosc 2016;28:701-13.

               2.   Andolfi C, Umanskiy K.Appraisal and current considerations of robotics in colon and rectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
                   2019;29:152-58.

               3.   Ocuin LM, TsungA. Robotic liver resection for malignancy: Current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future
                   applications. J Surg Oncol 2015;112:295-301.
               4.   Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D. A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic
                   hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2016;30:862-75.
               5.   Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 2014;259:549-55.
               6.   Kingham TP, Leung U, Kuk D, et al. Robotic liver resection: a case matched comparison. World J Surg 2016;40:1422-8.

               7.  MakuuchiM. Surgical treatment for HCC--special reference to anatomical resection. Int J Surg 2013;11:S47-9.
               8.   Shindoh J, Makuuchi M, Matsuyama Y, et al. Complete removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory decreases local tumor recurrence
                   and improves disease-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2016;64:594-600.
               9.  KishiY, Hasegawa K, Kaneko J, et al. Resection of segment VIII for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 2012;99:1105-12.


               10.  Hasegawa Y, Nitta H, Takahara T, et al. Safely extending the indications of laparoscopic liver resection: When should we start
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78