Page 131 - Read Online
P. 131

Page 4 of 10                           Xu et al. Chem Synth 2023;3:17  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cs.2022.35

               Table 1. Condition ptimization a
                                                      o
                Entry      L    solvent        x    T ( C)      yield  (%)         dr c    ee (%)
                                                                                             d
                                                                   b
                1          L1   THF            10   30          56                 1.5:1   39
                2          L2   THF            10   30          54                 3.5:1   35
                3          L3   THF            10   30          61                 3.3:1   69
                4          L4   THF            10   30          65                 3.5:1   77
                5          L5   THF            10   30          55                 3.1:1   37
                6          L6   THF            10   30          45                 1.1:1   37
                7          L7   THF            10   30          39                 1.2:1   23
                8          L8   THF            10   30          49                 1:1     37
                9          L4   PhMe           10   30          56                 2.8:1   60
                10         L4   MeCN           10   30          71                 3:1     84
                11         L4   CH Cl 2        10   30          65                 2.7:1   75
                                  2
                12         L4   CHCl 3         10   30          70                 1.7:1   59
                13         L4   PhCF 3         10   30          60                 2.1:1   63
                14         L4   MeCN           10   0           46                 1.5:1   40
                15         L4   MeCN           10   10          69                 3:1     80
                16         L4   MeCN           10   40          71                 3:1     84
                17         L4   MeCN           10   50          69                 3:1     82
                18         L4   MeCN           3    30          54                 3:1     85
                19         L4   MeCN           5    30          82                 3:1     88
                20         L4   MeCN           15   30          74                 3:1     80

               a
                Reaction conditions: Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were conducted with x mol % of ligand, 2x mol % of  ZnEt , 0.10 mmol 1a and 0.10
                                                                                          2
                                                                               1
                               b
                                         c
                                                                                                       d
               mmol 2a in 2 mL solvent.  Isolated yields.  The diastereomeric ratio parameter of 3a was detected by  H NMR of the crude reaction mixture.  The
               enantiomeric excess (ee) value was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.
               54% yield, 4.5:1 dr and 82% ee value. Next, the scope of Ar group appended to the double bond of
                                                                     2
               nitroenones was investigated. As illustrated in Scheme 3, both electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl
               groups could be tolerated, delivering the corresponding products 3h-3k in 54%-79% yields, 2.8:1-9:1
               diastereoselectivities and 79%-91% enantioselectivities. Furthermore, incorporating a heteroaromatic group
                                                      2
                  2
               (Ar  = 2-furyl) or a sterically bulky group (Ar  = 1-naphthyl) did not affect the efficiency of the reaction (3l
               and 3m). Currently, only nitroenones bearing different aromatic substituents have been examined.
               Subsequently, we investigated the substrate generality of α-hydroxy-1-indanones by reacting them with 1-
               (2-methoxyphenyl)-2-nitro-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one 2f. Different substituents (from electron-donating to
               electron-withdrawing) at the C-4 to 6 positions of α-hydroxy-1-indanones 1 participated in the cascade
               reactions to give the desired products 3n-3x in 62%-81% yields, 4.3:1-13:1 diastereoselectivities and 86%-
               96% enantioselectivities. Notably, the absolute configuration of the major isomer of product 3f was
               determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis and that of other products was assigned by analogy .
                                                                                                    [27]

               To showcase the synthetic utility of this protocol, a gram-scale synthesis of 3f was carried out by using 5
               mmol of 1a and 5 mmol of 2f. Under the standard condition, the reaction proceeded smoothly to give
               product 3f in 69% yield (1.48 g) with 10:1 dr and 93% ee [Scheme 4A]. Further reduction of nitro group with
               the NiCl /NaBH  system and hydrolysis of the ester group took place in one-pot and afforded the
                       2
                              4
               indeno[1,2-b]pyrrol-(3H)-ol derivative 5 [Scheme 4B].
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136