Page 41 - Read Online
P. 41

Page 20 of 21                   Özbek et al. Carbon Footprints 2025, 4, 30  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2025.43

                   in the background of the SDGs. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 443, 141020.  DOI
               22.      Cutcu, I.; Eren, M. V.; Cil, D.; Karis, C.; Kocak, S. What is the long-run relationship between military expenditures, foreign trade and
                   ecological footprint? Evidence from method of Maki cointegration test. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27, 19889-919.  DOI
               23.      Gao, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, Y.; Liu, D.; Chen, Y. How does new energy demonstration city pilot policy affect carbon dioxide
                   emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environ. Res. 2024, 244, 117912.  DOI
               24.      Cao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y. The nexus of environmental protection and economic growth in northern minority areas of China under
                   the background of sustainable climate policies. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7178.  DOI
               25.      Zhang, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Z.; Feng, Y. What is the causal relationship among geopolitical risk, financial development,
                   and energy transition? Evidence from 25 OECD countries. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2025, 104, 104288.  DOI
               26.      Roy, A. The impact of foreign direct investment, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and natural resources on
                   ecological footprint: an Indian perspective. Int. J. Energy. Sect. Manag. 2024, 18, 141-61.  DOI
               27.      Adekoya, O. B.; Oliyide, J. A.; Fasanya, I. O. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption - Ecological footprint nexus in net-
                   oil exporting and net-oil importing countries: policy implications for a sustainable environment. Renew. Energy. 2022, 189, 524-34.
                   DOI
               28.      Idroes, G. M.; Hardi, I.; Rahman, M. H.; Afjal, M.; Noviandy, T. R.; Idroes, R. The dynamic impact of non-renewable and renewable
                   energy on carbon dioxide emissions and ecological footprint in Indonesia. Carbon. Res. 2024, 3, 117.  DOI
               29.      Destek, M. A.; Sinha, A. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint:
                   evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118537.  DOI
               30.      Dogan, E.; Majeed, M. T.; Luni, T. Revisiting the nexus of ecological footprint, unemployment, and renewable and non-renewable
                   energy for South Asian economies: evidence from novel research methods. Renew. Energy. 2022, 194, 1060-70.  DOI
               31.      Kongkuah, M. Impact of Belt and Road countries’ renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint. Environ.
                   Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 8709-34.  DOI
               32.      Pata, U. K. Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO  emissions, and ecological footprint in the
                                                                              2
                   USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 846-61.  DOI  PubMed
               33.      Wang, Q.; Hu, S.; Ge, Y.; Li, R. Impact of eco-innovation and financial efficiency on renewable energy - evidence from OECD
                   countries. Renew. Energy. 2023, 217, 119232.  DOI
               34.      Zhang, C.; Yao, Y.; Zhou, H. External technology dependence and manufacturing TFP: evidence from China. Res. Int. Bus. Finance.
                   2023, 64, 101885.  DOI
               35.      Khan, S.; Yuan, H.; Yahong, W.; Ahmad, F. Environmental implications of technology-driven energy deficit and urbanization: insights
                   from the environmental Kuznets and pollution hypothesis. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 34, 103554.  DOI
               36.      Chen, S. Renewable energy technology innovation and urbanization: insights from China. Sustain. Cities. Soc. 2024, 102, 105241.
                   DOI
               37.      Kusiyah, K.; Mushtaq, M.; Ahmed, S.; Abbas, A.; Fahlevi, M. Impact of urbanization on environmental eminence: moderating role of
                   renewable energy. Int. J. Energy. Econ. Policy. 2024, 14, 244-57.  DOI
               38.      Yin, C.; Qamruzzaman, M. Empowering renewable energy consumption through public-private investment, urbanization, and
                   globalization: Evidence from CS-ARDL and NARDL. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26455.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               39.      Simeon, E. O.; Hongxing, Y.; Sampene, A. K. The role of green finance and renewable energy in shaping zero-carbon transition:
                   evidence from the E7 economies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 21, 7077-98.  DOI
               40.      Raihan, A. Green energy and technological innovation towards a low-carbon economy in bangladesh. Green. Low-Carbon. Econ.
                   2025, 3, 171-81.  DOI
               41.      Xing, H.; Husain, S.; Simionescu, M.; Ghosh, S.; Zhao, X. Role of green innovation technologies and urbanization growth for energy
                   demand: contextual evidence from G7 countries. Gondwana. Res. 2024, 129, 220-38.  DOI
               42.      Wang, Q.; Zhang, F. Free trade and renewable energy: a cross-income levels empirical investigation using two trade openness
                   measures. Renew. Energy. 2021, 168, 1027-39.  DOI
               43.      Zeren, F.; Akkuş, H. T. The relationship between renewable energy consumption and trade openness: new evidence from emerging
                   economies. Renew. Energy. 2020, 147, 322-9.  DOI
               44.      Han, J.; Zeeshan, M.; Ullah, I.; Rehman, A.; Afridi, F. E. A. Trade openness and urbanization impact on renewable and non-renewable
                   energy consumption in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 41653-68.  DOI
               45.      Khan, H.; Weili, L.; Khan, I.; Khamphengxay, S.; Kazak, J. Renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental
                   degradation: a panel data analysis of developing and developed countries. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1-13.  DOI
               46.      Alam, M. M.; Murad, M. W. The impacts of economic growth, trade openness and technological progress on renewable energy use in
                   organization for economic co-operation and development countries. Renew. Energy. 2020, 145, 382-90.  DOI
               47.      Murshed, M. Does improvement in trade openness facilitate renewable energy transition? Evidence from selected South Asian
                   economies. South. Asia. Econ. J. 2018, 19, 151-70.  DOI
               48.      Jóźwik, B.; Sarigül, S. S.; Topcu, B. A.; Çetin, M.; Doğan, M. Trade openness, economic growth, capital, and financial globalization:
                   unveiling their impact on renewable energy consumption. Energies 2025, 18, 1244.  DOI
               49.      Zhongwei, H.; Liu, Y. The role of eco-innovations, trade openness, and human capital in sustainable renewable energy consumption:
                   evidence using CS-ARDL approach. Renew. Energy. 2022, 201, 131-40.  DOI
               50.      Global Footprint Network. Available from: https://www.footprintnetwork.org/ [Last accessed on 25 Oct 2025].
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46